>>"On Fri, 16 May 2008 09:29:26 -0500, "BretLudwig" <bratzirules@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> I said so, and because it's a halfass and dumb thing to do
You just really love chest beating and making useless arbitrary
declarations, don't you?
No offense but "I said so" doesn't hold any water.
> unless for some
>reason you really HAD to. You are using a lot of parts and going to a
lot
>of trouble
No trouble.
> to enable you to use a junkyard part that doesn't work
>properly.
Works perfectly.
> It will probably cost you more than buying the correct part and
>it will be less reliable. Unnecessary parts offer unnecessary
op****tunity
>for failure.
>
> The correct part IS available and it IS NOT very expensive. And it will
>be troubleshootable by most anyone.
It's also 'easier' to buy the whole damn amp put together.
Btw, no one's asking you to build that circuit."<<
Good thing, too.
I am working under the presumption here that the goal is to build a
working, sustainable, producible, good performing product and not just to
**** around with a bunch of electrojunk for idle amusement.
There are an infinite number of ways to do the latter and this one is
neither particularly interesting nor challenging. Bob Pease publishes
goofy circuits like the one this week for a one transistor op amp using
several transformers in "Electronic Design". That's considerably more
challenging, though your kludge works a little better-still not well
enough to be a recommended practice.
But whatever rings your chimes....just call it what it is, idle ****ing
around.
--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.tubes/
More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html
|
