suckerton2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2:32 am, Patrick Turner <i...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > BretLudwig wrote:
> >
> > > Again, while human males and females are NOT totally universally
adapted,
> > > 85% of males work well in 85% of females. The advantage of large
*****
> > > size, aside from success in the **** film industry (too modern and
unusual
> > > to be of evolutionary im****tance) is visual and mostly by directly
acting
> > > on the minds of other hetero***ual males, by giving the bejingled
> > > intergroup status, which THEN transfers to desireability amongst the
> > > female herd.
> >
> > > The appeal to homo***ual males is irrelevant evolutionarily. The
direct
> > > appeal to females is relevant only in the case of size queens, most
of
> > > whom are not especially loose in the cunnus, but have a
psychological need
> > > for being stuffed. It's a fairly irrelevant thing evolutionarily. As
is the
> > > case of the genuinely wide-****ed, who desire the specially huge men
for
> > > simple fit reasons. Today most of these women get "torqued down"
> > > surgically because the same phenomenon also renders them fecally or
> > > urinarily incontinent in many cases.
> >
> > > This is a little off subject, sorry....
> >
> > I am not the slightest bit prudish and retain undiminished interest in
> > ***uality.
> >
> > I am not so sure I can agree with your logic about genital sizes.
> >
> > I've never met or had *** with a "torqued down" ****ela.
> > despite repeated childbirth or none at all, the FANNY is
> > still an intersting thing and varies in size, taste, smell, cost and
> > availability and so does the person attatched to the darn thing.
>
> There is a biological condition in which women have outsized vaginas
> and anuses. It's surgically fixable, it's rare, and it occurs most
> frequently in populations in the Middle East such as Berbers, where
> unfortunately getting it fixed is complicated by both poverty and the
> fundamentalist Islamic attitudes and mores regarding medicine.
Well, I did say to expect major variations in the human genital
condition.
What might be normal to some because they were born with their
characeristics
is abnormal to others.
For centuries white westerners thought black skinned folks were
sub-normal,
just glorified animals, so no need to feel sorry for having a few black
slaves around.
Let's not discuss the mutilation of females to remove the ****oris
to calm them down and make them docile and and faithful.
This appalling practice is occuring here in Oz amoung migrants from
ME and African countries, and girls are turning up at hospitals
in a terrible condition of having been sewn up, with infections,
fistulas, etc. Fortunately something can be done to
help them, but they can't give them back their ****oris.
But cultural practices in far off countries ain't my own real concern
or been part of my own experience.
Western white caucasian women have been my concern.
I have found that western women have very little control over their
muscles of the lower parts, and to teach them control, I have suggested
to a few that
they try inserting a carrot while standing, legs lightly apart,
with pointy end first. This might slip out of most ladies
but when well trained, they can grip it well.
They laugh so much at first they just can't get through the first
learning.
They certainly need to exersize the lower muscles when they age because
they
become incontinent all too easily.
And when over 50 so many are quite alergic to any form of vigourous
exercize
including regular rythmic ***, or like me, riding 200km on a bicycle
each week, every week.
Thus trained, they can be led to using this empowerment
in bed to grip a man, instead of just lying there like a lazy sack of
****ridge.
They will feel more pleasure and might even climax. Many don't of
course, over 50%,
from only penetration.
There are rather too many to who any suggestion of anything novel or
merely different cannot be made
without causing offence, and I have politely left them alone for some
other brainless man to have and to hold.
Its almost normal for many men to be strong and silent types.
Talking to ****elas about anything emotional or about *** usually
ends in a row, hence men learn to shut up. Talking about money is also a
devil.
There is a thin line between teaching empowerment, and either ridiculing
a ****ela
or abusing her.
I'd say only one in 10 really has any idea of how to give a good BJ.
They expect a man to climax after a minute, and they peck like a chook,
chomping
with the teeth, or don't suck.
Some really hate it, but they clutch our heads in extacy when we go down
on them.
Bedtime is a place where ppl ought to raise a sweat, but hey, its mostly
not the female who does.
When a man wants to marry, he must be careful.
He might look for a good housekeeper.
When he finds one, beware divorce, because she keeps the house.
One thing is for sure, the ****o industry ****trays
most sheilas as being 99% opposite to how they really are,
except for maybe 1 week when they are 25, and on a honeymoon,
with squillions of $$$$ being spent in an exotic romantic location.
I can see why the ****o industry is profitable.
And I can see how rising house prices and cost of living prices
are lowering the birthrate, and how the availability of ****
is changing morals and men's expectations of women for the very worst.
Who's gonna DT you? Its quite the unmentionable.
We have swapped trying to be happy for trying to be rich.
People are expected to slave their guts out in a "growth economy".
What are we growing?
Where the heck are we going?
Patrick Turner.
|
