Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Audio > Audio Tubes > Re: AM detector...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 75 of 87 Topic 8986 of 9184
Post > Topic >>

Re: AM detectors, was re: OPT equalising circuit

by Patrick Turner <info@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 6, 2008 at 12:57 PM

Alex wrote:
> 
> "Patrick Turner" <info@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:481F27AD.428815B9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >
> > It works, try it. The CF idle dc current of 1mA is OK.
> > But the gm is much higher than 0.5mA/V.
> > As the tube turns on harder gm much increases.
> > It wouldn't work well to get a negative going voltage.
> > But OK for a positive going voltage.
> > THD is well under 1%, better than 5% as in most detectors.
> 
> Patrick, do you have a quality signal generator capable of  nearly 100%
AM
> to test?
> Otherwise, how could you measure the detector THD?

I have a Topward sig gene which produces good AM adjusrable to over 100%
mod.
Its SS.
My own home designed and built AM gene has all tubes and can do 100% +
mod, but its 
not as linear. 

To find out THD, the modulated envelope wave form of the carrier in the
gene 
is compared with the detector output AF using a dual trace CRO.
Once lined up so the AF trace outlines the envelope shape the %
moulation can be changed 
but there isn't any discernible departure between AM wave and the AF
recovered,
so I guess THD is < or close to 1%.

I have compared the input AM waves to recovered audio in other detectors
that are not so linear.


> 
> I guess such AM generator can be built on the basis of a DSP and a good
> DAC... Possibly it might be my next weekend project.

Why would you bother?

Just digitise the antenna signal and use digital processing to extract
the audio.
It may not sound as well as a CF and diode.
There are whole virtual radio chips available.

50 ways to leave your lover, and 51 ways to decode AM,
52 reasons why I didn't get laid last night.
Many different ways of doing lotsa things.


> 
> > > For the detector to begin detecting, obviously the AC current
through
> the
> > > diode shall exceed the DC component (90uA). It will require about
150mV
> on
> > > the input to the detector or conversely 400mV on the grid of the CF.
> > > Sensitivity of such a detector is rather poor (as you know,
sensitivity
> of a
> > > pure p-n diode is about 25mV.)
> >
> > Doesn't matter because the signal to be detected from the IFT is so
> > large
> > that one can get about -12Vdc of AFC voltage, more than needed.
> 
> Yes, agree. With such a strong signal any detector will work, even the
so
> called cathode detector -- just remove the silicon diode, remove the 33K
> pull-down resistor and use the sharp cut-off tube solely.
> >
> > >
> > > It is easy to improve the result 10 times -- just reduce the bias.
> Connect
> > > R17 not to the ground, but to point "R" (+31V). After that the diode
> will be
> > > biased only by the self bias of the tube, which is about 4V.
Sensitivity
> of
> > > the detector will increase 10-fold.
> >
> > The sensitivity you mention isn't needed or wanted.
> 
> Understand.
> >
> > The R16 and R17 network are 330k and 100k = 430k,
> > as as the cathode of CF is at about +33Vdc, there is a dc current
> > through the diode = 33/430 mA
> > or about 0.09mA, and this stays fairly constant with changes to AF
> > voltage in the 220pF.
> > I found having a virtual constant current discharge of this C was much
> > better than having
> > a large R taken to a voltage not much different to Ek.
> >
> > I suggest you build this detector and give it a decent test using a
> > 455kHz modulated test
> > signal. The main advanatge is that at high percentages of modulation
> > used these days the distortion
> > remains low until very close to 100%.
> 
> My favourite detector is the emitter detector preceeded by a source
> follower. Its sensitivity is 25mV. A great disadvantage though that it
can
> not stand a carrier more than 1.5...2Vm because of the reverse breakdown
> voltage of the transistor. Linearity is perfect.
> >
> > In many radios the detector suffers cut off distortion as % mod rises.
> 
> Agree. Some can not stand more than 60% of modulation, even at low audio
> frequencies.
> >
> > With very small signals, the detector suffers no diode threshold
effects
> > because the
> > diode is 'on' at all times.
> 
> Yes, the diode is always ON, but it does not do good, contrary to a
common
> belief. Because of high diode bias, the detection (rectification) will
begin
> after the 455KHz AC component will exceed the DC component. Below that
the
> diode is virtually a resistor of about 250ohm. So your CF is loaded by a
> 250ohm in series with 220pF, representing about 1.6K impedance. From
that
> you need at least 150mV of the signal on the diode (more on the grid)
for AC
> exceed DC.

My detector is a vast improvement on many others I have inspected in
normal 
old radios.

Patrick Turner.
> 
> Regards,
> Alex
> >
> > Patrick Turner.
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alex
 




 87 Posts in Topic:
OPT equalising circuit
Alex <apogosso@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 19:07:20 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-02 16:38:09 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-02 09:07:11 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Alex" <apog  2008-05-02 10:25:13 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-02 11:01:52 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Alex" <apog  2008-05-02 13:33:31 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 00:16:56 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-02 13:02:12 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 00:38:46 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Jon Yaeger <jono_1@[EM  2008-05-02 14:04:27 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 10:37:31 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 10:43:04 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-03 16:03:56 
"Alex The **** Head"
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 00:15:28 
Re: "Alex The **** Head"
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-02 13:05:26 
Re: "Alex The **** Head"
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 10:12:21 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 10:37:37 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-04 20:27:27 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Alex" <apog  2008-05-05 12:04:51 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-05 10:28:54 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-05 14:42:59 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-05 10:33:20 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 10:08:10 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-02 22:45:23 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 13:56:19 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-03 01:36:55 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 18:41:17 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-03 07:58:31 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-04 01:25:42 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-03 09:56:16 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-03 12:33:17 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-03 13:07:51 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-03 23:53:38 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-03 22:10:15 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-04 13:26:08 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-04 01:18:23 
flipper the steaming great ****head
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-04 16:29:32 
Re: flipper the steaming great ****head
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-04 04:32:48 
flipper = steaming great ****head
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-04 21:30:11 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Robert Casey <wa2ise@[  2008-05-04 16:07:18 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-05 10:46:22 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
The Phantom <phantom@[  2008-05-03 20:55:21 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-03 15:44:11 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Iain Churches"  2008-05-04 20:29:33 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-05 10:00:43 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-05 14:30:28 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-06 10:51:34 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-05 10:36:58 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Iain Churches"  2008-05-05 15:55:30 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-05 23:04:06 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Jon Yaeger <jono_1@[EM  2008-05-05 09:49:00 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-05 23:55:55 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Jon Yaeger <jono_1@[EM  2008-05-05 10:23:48 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Iain Churches"  2008-05-05 19:16:55 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Iain Churches"  2008-05-04 20:36:50 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-05 10:01:49 
"Alex the Top Posting **** "
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 00:37:35 
Re: "Alex the Top Posting **** "
"Alex" <apog  2008-05-03 05:37:51 
Re: "Alex the Top Posting **** "
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 16:07:03 
Re: "Alex the Top Posting **** "
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-03 01:45:25 
Re: "Alex the Top Posting **** "
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-03 18:41:46 
Re: "Alex the Top Posting **** "
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-03 08:02:09 
Re: "Alex the Top Posting **** "
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-04 01:26:05 
Re: "Alex the Top Posting **** "
flipper <flipper@[EMAI  2008-05-03 12:28:01 
Re: "Alex the Top Posting **** "
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-04 09:47:45 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
mick <not.here@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 16:15:45 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Ian Thompson-Bell <ruf  2008-05-02 17:58:12 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-02 17:03:26 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Alex" <apog  2008-05-03 05:41:51 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-03 16:07:31 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Alex" <apog  2008-05-05 09:26:59 
AM detectors, was re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-05 15:28:53 
Re: AM detectors, was re: OPT equalising circuit
"Alex" <apog  2008-05-06 11:29:01 
Re: AM detectors, was re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-06 22:55:59 
Re: AM detectors, was re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-06 12:57:18 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-06 22:56:26 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-06 13:59:22 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-03 16:34:54 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Alex" <apog  2008-05-05 09:39:08 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-05 23:00:45 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-05 10:30:52 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Patrick Turner <info@[  2008-05-05 15:55:59 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-05 16:17:16 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"BretLudwig" &l  2008-05-04 17:45:18 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
Alex <apogosso@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 17:48:52 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
"Phil Allison"   2008-05-06 22:55:27 
Re: OPT equalising circuit
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-05-06 13:02:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 15:32:09 CDT 2008.