Re: NFB101 Crisis Averted

Patrick Turner wrote:
> 
> Ian Thompson-Bell wrote:
>> Patrick Turner wrote:
>>> Are we considering an amp without R1?
>>>
>>> I thought we were considering a tume or opamp ect always with R1 and
R2
>>> connected.
>>>
>>> If you wish to share your problems then you MUST spell the set up we
are
>>> talking about.
>>>
>>> Don't EVER assume I can read your mind. I'm a terrible mind reader.
>>>
>>>
>> I thought I made that clear in my original post.
> 
> After several posts go by, the focus is lost.
> 
> I sure lose the focus if you don't spell things out MORE CLEARLY.
> 
> This means the schematic of what you ARE talking about MUST be constant
> and well described so there is NO confusion.
> 
> People want to know WHAT you are talking about.
> Not just a formula ot theory, but something real doingt something,
> ie, a vacuum tube or tubes set up for work to do something wanted. 
> 
> You must learn to treat all the other guys like dumb bastards but
> without insult,
> and assume they know nothing unless you tell them.
> 
> All the best teachers I ever had were like this.
> They ran hot and sweaty because they tried hard, god luv 'em.
> 
> That might mean a lot more typing for you.
> 

That is precisely what I am aiming for in NFB101. However, the original 
post was just meant to let people know I had found a solution to that 
particular problem rather than to present the solution in full.
Cheers

Ian