by "Ian Iveson" <IanIveson.home@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 23, 2008 at 06:01 PM
Ian Thompson-Bell wrote:
> Ian Iveson wrote:
>> Ian Thompson-Bell wrote
>>
>>> I have just been working through the math for shunt
>>> derived shunt applied NFB around an amp and Ican't get
>>> the expected result.
>>
>> Is that the same as voltage derived, current applied? I
>> can never remember this stuff, sigh.
>>
>
> No, it's voltage derived, voltage applied. As a rule:
>
> Shunt = Voltage
> Series = Current
Thanks. Then how come your circuit employs "shunt derived"
feedback?
And perhaps you could answer the question you cut out from
my post, considering I was good enough to answer yours:
"Your maths is correct or we're both wrong.
"I don't know if it helps to see it as Ao/(1+ß.(1+Ao))
"You haven't explained why you believe there is an anomaly.
What led you to your erroneous expectation?"
Ian
