Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Audio > Audio Tubes > Re: Wot? No tu...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 61 of 70 Topic 8935 of 9180
Post > Topic >>

Re: Wot? No tube mixer??

by John Byrns <byrnsj@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 22, 2008 at 09:24 AM

In article 
<ccaa80f9-a3b9-4ce4-9b91-6658b7a70c77@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Peter Wieck <pfjw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On Apr 22, 9:41 am, John Byrns <byr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > Your comment "one at 3A (a pair of EL34's)" suggests that you are
> > contemplating running the EL34 heaters in parallel, this seems like a
> > singularly bad idea to me.  Unless the heaters in both tubes are
> > identical the current will divide unequally between the two heaters.  
> > There is also no guarantee that you will get 6.3 volts across the
> > heaters, so the heaters will likely not be operating at either rated
> > voltage or current.  If I were using current regulation I would
connect
> > the two heaters in series so that I would be guaranteed that the
heaters
> > would operate at their rated current.
> 
> Are you sure?

Yes

> Parallel devices see the same voltage along the entire circuit, don't
> they?

Yes

> Like ties on a railroad track?

I'm not sure what you mean with the railroad tracks?

> I am thinking of the dozens of
> lamps in our house, each one "dividing" current unequally between the
> heaters (filaments)... and they are not hardly identical.

Correct, but the parallel connected lamps in your house are feed from 
what is essentially a constant voltage source, not a constant current 
source.  If you house hold power was supplied by a constant current 
source, each time you turned on another lamp the ones that were already 
on would get dimmer, and if you had only one lamp on it probably 
wouldn't last very long before burning out.

When I was a kid I was always fascinated by the series connection used 
by the city for some of the street lights.  I don't know what the 
voltage rating of the bulbs was, but they were incandescent types and a 
number of them were wired in series across the 2,400 volt distribution 
feeders.

> Now, series devices may see problems depending on the nature of the
> two (or more) devices in the string?

Sounds likely, but parallel connected devices are no different and may 
also see problems depending on the nature of the two (or more) devices 
connected in parallel.


Regards,

John Byrns

-- 
Surf my web pages at,  http://fmamradios.com/
 




 70 Posts in Topic:
Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-21 12:30:36 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Ian Thompson-Bell <ruf  2008-04-21 15:54:02 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-21 17:34:01 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-21 20:22:17 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-21 23:44:39 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 07:17:45 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 12:38:41 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 14:58:33 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 14:05:10 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 16:29:02 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 14:52:52 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 17:14:06 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Ian Thompson-Bell <ruf  2008-04-22 16:04:21 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 18:41:29 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Ian Thompson-Bell <ruf  2008-04-22 17:42:47 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 20:23:19 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 19:21:29 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 19:14:32 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 21:20:47 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 20:09:46 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Ian Thompson-Bell <ruf  2008-04-22 23:28:17 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 23:43:21 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Ian Thompson-Bell <ruf  2008-04-22 11:58:11 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 14:45:46 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Ian Thompson-Bell <ruf  2008-04-22 13:02:01 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 15:31:46 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Ian Thompson-Bell <ruf  2008-04-22 15:57:38 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 18:23:06 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 19:11:16 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 21:29:17 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-04-22 08:41:15 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 14:54:19 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 17:20:49 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-04-22 09:33:20 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 18:30:26 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-04-22 13:43:05 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 22:14:36 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 21:28:32 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 16:40:06 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"J.Koning" <  2008-04-22 19:29:41 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 20:49:01 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"keithr" <ke  2008-04-23 10:41:49 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-23 08:51:24 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-23 09:58:37 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-23 20:40:29 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-23 21:14:02 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"J.Koning" <  2008-04-23 21:26:23 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-23 22:57:25 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-23 21:29:54 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"J.Koning" <  2008-04-23 23:35:55 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-23 23:26:30 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"J.Koning" <  2008-04-23 22:41:31 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-24 07:37:08 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-24 06:52:45 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"J.Koning" <  2008-04-24 10:00:43 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
mick <not.here@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:14:23 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-21 23:45:48 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Peter Wieck <pfjw@[EMA  2008-04-22 04:23:15 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-22 14:50:03 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Peter Wieck <pfjw@[EMA  2008-04-22 07:03:36 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-04-22 09:24:21 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
mick <not.here@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 17:56:57 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 19:41:42 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Peter Wieck <pfjw@[EMA  2008-04-22 12:12:37 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-04-23 09:06:30 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-23 15:21:51 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2008-04-23 11:35:57 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-23 21:13:08 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
"Iain Churches"  2008-04-23 20:57:02 
Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
mick <not.here@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 10:55:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 5 23:02:10 CDT 2008.