On 3/23/08 3:30 PM, in article
5dfc175e-f737-409a-8931-c47f10a94f48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"geezer"
<liveoak.nine@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I didn't "unilaterally declare acceptable terms", just pointed out
> that while claiming to disagree with me, you actually made my point.
> Your statement that audio purists can't scientifically recreate a
> performance space, but that they CAN do it to their subjective
> satisfaction, is just nonsense.
I didn't make your point, so don't misquote me. I know as a degreed
engineer that this is easily possible with the current digital tools we
have
available. I've done it myself easily with the high-end gear I've
scrounged
over the years plus the new recording techniques I've developed. It's
really not that hard.
>
> AND, you can't even tell whether your preferred recording uses the
> very compression and reverb that you otherwise deem aesthetically
> unacceptable. If you don't know, and can't tell, perhaps you should
> re-think your position on this point.
I'm a degreed engineer, I've thought about it plenty. I've proven you
don't
need that compression and reverb ****, and expect that once the market
starts to experience true reality captured in a recording, you won't be
using it any more either.
When you build a better mousetrap, people will beat a path to your door.
My
door is open to skeptics like yourself.
Regards
Bob Morein
Dresher, PA
(310) 237-6511
|
