On Mar 21, 5:30=A0pm, "Mark" <mark...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Andre Jute" <fiul...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:a1fa328e-ee9f-42cf-821b-f7237a6dc2ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 21, 2:38 am, "roughplanet" <roughpla...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Andre Jute" <fiul...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:83bbe9bc-cce1-4a2f-8b02-9621a8cd05be@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Mar 20, 7:40 am, "Mark" <mark...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Actually sorry for jumping on you Keith.
>
> > > Andre's original post, that 'it depends' on who the 10,000 are,
really=
> > > got
> > > me riled. Considering all the publicity surrounding the
proliferation =
of
> > > school massacres in the US, I just don't understand how anyone can
com=
e
> > > out
> > > with a statement as hugely ignorant as that.
>
> > > It doesn't depend at all on which kids are killed in schools by
other
> > > kids.
> > > CHANGE THE ****ING CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS, YANK
> > > MORONS!!!
>
> > > There...now I feel better.
>
> > You're a piece of work, Mark, and a very unsavoury one at that.
>
> > Here is my entire exchange with Trevor Wilson:
>
> > *****
> > On Mar 19, 1:54 am, "Trevor Wilson" wrote:
>
> > > The clear wording [in the American Constitution] involves the term:
> > > "...well
> > > regulated militia.."
> > > American gun loons regularly ignore this part of the 2nd Amendment.
Th=
ey
> > > also manage to ignore the 10,000 dead Americans, murdered by other
gun=
> > > loons
> > > each and every year.
>
> > > Trevor Wilson
>
> > At the very least, Trevor, you must admit that it is a
*self*-regulating=
> > militia; whether it is *well* self-regulated depends on who the 10,000
> > dead
> > are.
>
> > Andre Jute
> > Darwin's little helper
> > ****
>
> > Where does it say anything about "school children" either specifically
> > or by implication?
>
> > If you had actually read what I wrote, instead of kneejerking, you
> > would have discovered I was clearly speaking of adults:
>
> > "Militia" implies adults and excludes school children.
>
> > "other gun loons" are gun nuts permitted to buy arms under the Second
> > Amendment; they do not include school children.
>
> > "regulated militia" tells you again I was speaking about adults; the
> > officers of any militia are not school children.
>
> > School children who shoot their schoolmates didn't come by those arms
> > legally. Nothing in what I said relates to school children except in
> > your over-heated mind, Mark.
>
> > It is typical of the thoughtlessness and hypocritical double standards
> > on RAT that you apologize to fascist s*** like Keith Richardson while
> > attempting to blame me for your stupid incomprehension.
>
> > I repeat, I said it is no loss to the gene pool if gun nuts murder
> > each other or shoot themselves. I said nothing about their children
> > taking guns to school and murdering their classmates. It is simply
> > unbelievable for some some anonymous clown called MarkS to blame me
> > for dead schoolchildren because I condemn their parents for stupidity
> > without ever mentioning the children.
>
> > Finally, your assumption that I knew about the schoolyard massacres is
> > entirely incorrect. I don't read the papers or watch television, and I
> > doubt those events even made the news here. Your presumption that
> > other people live as you do, do what you do, think like you do, is not
> > only stupidly parochial but deeply offensive, especially when you
> > accuse them of being callous on hand of these impertinent presumptions
> > you hold.
>
> > Andre Jute
> > No longer surprised by the foolishness of the clowns on RAT
>
> Roughplanet then comments:
>
>
>
> > Yep, he's correct whether you like it or not. Assumptions are just the
> > extension of our own egos, therefore there are literally billions of
the=
m
> > on
> > any given subject.
>
> > The saying 'Assume makes an ass out of u and me' is right on the
money,
> > closely followed by 'Post hoc ergo propter hoc'.
>
> > Usenet is one place where you WILL be called to account for your lack
of=
> > comprehension, ill-founded assumptions, guesswork, BS or any other
> > illogical
> > or asinine nonsense that people attempt to pass off for valid comment
on=
> > this & most other newsgroups.
>
> > The phrase 'Look before you leap' is a most apt summation of the rules
o=
f
> > Usenet.
> > Failure to adhere to same can only result in a painful & possibly
> > embarrassing public dressing down.
>
> > ruff
> > Never expected to find you standing up for me, Ruff. You'd better say
> > quickly that you're just standing up for the truth, that you hate me
> > doubletime for being right just this once. Being found agreeing with
> > me is a sure way to ruin your street cred with this gang of wrongoes.
Anonymous Mark then chipped in:
> I can't see anyone agreeing with your substantive position that it all
> depends on WHO gets murdered.
That's not what I said at all, Mark, and you know it. You're a liar.
> It might happen, sure.
What might happen?
> As for anyone standing up for you, I don't see anyone doing that either.
Oh, I think the handful of wannabe flame warriors on RAT overestimate
their im****tance. The posters and lurkers who measure a fellow-RAT by
what he says and does, rather then by what some little gang of loud
nobodies claims, make up the vast majority of the member****p.
> Don't try to hide behind others, mate.
Yeah, the moron Mark is coming for me. I ****ver in my boots.
> > Andre Jute
> > People are always the most surprising element
Unsigned out of contempt for a fool
|
