On Mar 21, 2:38=A0am, "roughplanet" <roughpla...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "Andre Jute" <fiul...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:83bbe9bc-cce1-4a2f-8b02-9621a8cd05be@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mar 20, 7:40 am, "Mark" <mark...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Actually sorry for jumping on you Keith.
>
> > Andre's original post, that 'it depends' on who the 10,000 are, really
g=
ot
> > me riled. Considering all the publicity surrounding the proliferation
of=
> > school massacres in the US, I just don't understand how anyone can
come
> > out
> > with a statement as hugely ignorant as that.
>
> > It doesn't depend at all on which kids are killed in schools by other
> > kids.
> > CHANGE THE ****ING CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS, YANK
> > MORONS!!!
>
> > There...now I feel better.
>
> You're a piece of work, Mark, and a very unsavoury one at that.
>
> Here is my entire exchange with Trevor Wilson:
>
> *****
> On Mar 19, 1:54 am, "Trevor Wilson" =A0wrote:
>
> > =A0The clear wording [in the American Constitution] involves the term:
> > "...well
> > regulated militia.."
> > American gun loons regularly ignore this part of the 2nd Amendment.
They=
> > also manage to ignore the 10,000 dead Americans, murdered by other gun
> > loons
> > each and every year.
>
> > Trevor Wilson
>
> At the very least, Trevor, you must admit that it is a *self*-regulating
> militia; whether it is *well* self-regulated depends on who the 10,000
dea=
d
> are.
>
> Andre Jute
> Darwin's little helper
> ****
>
> Where does it say anything about "school children" either specifically
> or by implication?
>
> If you had actually read what I wrote, instead of kneejerking, you
> would have discovered I was clearly speaking of adults:
>
> "Militia" implies adults and excludes school children.
>
> "other gun loons" are gun nuts permitted to buy arms under the Second
> Amendment; they do not include school children.
>
> "regulated militia" tells you again I was speaking about adults; the
> officers of any militia are not school children.
>
> School children who shoot their schoolmates didn't come by those arms
> legally. Nothing in what I said relates to school children except in
> your over-heated mind, Mark.
>
> It is typical of the thoughtlessness and hypocritical double standards
> on RAT that you apologize to fascist s*** like Keith Richardson while
> attempting to blame me for your stupid incomprehension.
>
> I repeat, I said it is no loss to the gene pool if gun nuts murder
> each other or shoot themselves. I said nothing about their children
> taking guns to school and murdering their classmates. It is simply
> unbelievable for some some anonymous clown called MarkS to blame me
> for dead schoolchildren because I condemn their parents for stupidity
> without ever mentioning the children.
>
> Finally, your assumption that I knew about the schoolyard massacres is
> entirely incorrect. I don't read the papers or watch television, and I
> doubt those events even made the news here. Your presumption that
> other people live as you do, do what you do, think like you do, is not
> only stupidly parochial but deeply offensive, especially when you
> accuse them of being callous on hand of these impertinent presumptions
> you hold.
>
> Andre Jute
> No longer surprised by the foolishness of the clowns on RAT
Roughplanet then comments:
> Yep, he's correct whether you like it or not. Assumptions are just the
> extension of our own egos, therefore there are literally billions of
them =
on
> any given subject.
>
> The saying 'Assume makes an ass out of u and me' is right on the money,
> closely followed by 'Post hoc ergo propter hoc'.
>
> Usenet is one place where you WILL be called to account for your lack of
> comprehension, ill-founded assumptions, guesswork, BS or any other
illogic=
al
> or asinine nonsense that people attempt to pass off =A0for valid comment
o=
n
> this & most other newsgroups.
>
> The phrase 'Look before you leap' is a most apt summation of the rules
of
> Usenet.
> Failure to adhere to same can only result in a painful & possibly
> embarrassing public dressing down.
>
> ruff
Never expected to find you standing up for me, Ruff. You'd better say
quickly that you're just standing up for the truth, that you hate me
doubletime for being right just this once. Being found agreeing with
me is a sure way to ruin your street cred with this gang of wrongoes.
Andre Jute
People are always the most surprising element
|
