Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

"Andre Jute" <fiultra@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:93adf0c0-861b-434c-914a-1fe2e8d59d75@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Flick. in the unlikely event that this loser Richardson ever says
> anything useful about tubes, someone can ****ge me. Until then I can't
> be bothered with him.

> Andre Jute
> Out of patience with an idiot

ROFL
Couldn't stand the heat, got out of the kitchen. What a toughie you are Mr

jute.

Keith

On Mar 18, 5:58 am, "keithr" <kei...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Andre Jute" <fiul...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:766a5c48-26fb-403f-b191-80a06fbb4cf5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > "keithr" <kei...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, who has now been stung into telling
> > us his name is Richardson, wrote:
>
> >> "Andre Jute" <fiul...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>>news:6d5275cf-244b-41e8-b72e-a7d6d571f2a8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > Anonymous "keithr" <kei...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> "Peter Wieck" <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>
>>news:7e146691-3e55-4efa-9630-a2108c0f7013@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> On Mar 17, 3:19 pm, flipper <flip...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:29:33 +0200, "Iain Churches"
>
> >> >> >> <Iai...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >"Peter Wieck" <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> >> >>
>news:b2884b82-ee97-487a-a319-095efdd2f0e2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> >> >> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X;
> >> >> >> >> en-us)
> >> >> >> >> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4
Safari/
> >> >> >> >> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
>
> >> >> >> >From where do you get this info, Peter?
>
> >> >> >> In Outlook Express, right click on the message in the preview 
> >> >> >> pane
> >> >> >> and
> >> >> >> select properties, then the details tab.
>
> >> >> > Yep. That's the way. Each reader has its own very similar
system,
> >> >> > but
> >> >> > the end-results are the same.
> >> >> > Every machine has a unique signature which cannot be disguised
by
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > "typical" anonymous remailer - at least not since 9/11. One
cannot
> >> >> > get
> >> >> > (easily) to a location or an original e-mail address, but one
can
> >> >> > determine whether the same machine sent various messages.
>
> >> >> I think that you actually mean an anonymous proxy rather than
> >> >> remailer,but
> >> >> that is a quibble, the effect is the same.
>
> >> > Where do you get the infernal cheek from to call yourself a
"computer
> >> > expert" and waste our bandwidth for weeks now with your computer
> >> > inanities, anonymous keifer?
>
> >> I don't actually recall ever calling myself a computer expert Andre, 
> >> but
> >> if
> >> I have done then undoubtably you will be able to provide the
reference.
> >> On
> >> the other hand, having been gainfully employed in the industry for 38
> >> years
> >> does confer some degree of knowledge of the subject.
>
> >> > Quite contrary to what you say, it is a
> >> > proxy server *and* it anonymises the mail and remails it to the
proxy
> >> > it has found. It is not a quibble.
>
> >> It may be both a proxy and remailer, but as you were posting via
google
> >> groups and using Safari then it was being used as a proxy at that
time.
>
> >> > It is what protects Gray and me from s*** like you and Worthless 
> >> > Wiecky
> >> > harassing our ISP.
>
> >> Definition: S*** - anybody who dares to question Andre Jute's
authority
> >> on
> >> any subject.
>
> > Definition of S***: Overage, overweight, overwrought schoolyard
> > bullies running around the net in packs picking on victims. Behaviour
> > especially prevalent among failed "engineers" and their hangers-on
> > among the jumped-up janitors.
>
> Funny because I would say that your tactics are bullying in the extreme
"I
> suggest you **** off right smartly, before I turn you into lunch." 
> friendly
> greeting? No?
>
> >> Now why would I want to harrass your ISP? In almost 20 years of using

> >> the
> >> internet, the only IPSs that I have ever corresponded with have been
my
> >> own.
>
> > Gee, ****, Richardson, you must be a better class of engineer than
> > some of the s*** we're used to on RAT, who thought nothing of faking
> > letters and sending them in my name and then complaining to my ISP
> > about the letters they themselves wrote. Just a pity you still lie so.
>
> please point out any lies contained herin.
>
>
>
> >> > It is what
> >> > makes poor Worthless Wiecky's touted expose ludicrous. (In addition

> >> > to
> >> > his errors and/or lies about what the data proves -- below I show 
> >> > that
> >> > the data is "unique" to hundreds of thousands of computers!)
>
> >> >>The headers have nothing to do
> >> >> with 9/11, they have been a part of usenet fron the start, just 
> >> >> delve
> >> >> back
> >> >> in google groups an look at old messages.
>
> >> > I wonder if Worthless Wiecky will apologize to people for telling 
> >> > them
> >> > that lie, or if Poopie, another supposed "computer expert". will
> >> > apologize for letting Worthless Wiecky's ignorance pass.
>
> >> >> The information above doesn't actually pin it to a machine since a
> >> >> proxy
> >> >> was
> >> >> used, however it is unusual enough to make it fairly certain that 
> >> >> both
> >> >> messages came from joot.
>
> >> > ROTFLOL. See below about 297,000 "unique" instances.
>
> >> > And, even if you could pin the information to unique machine, guess
> >> > what, it would be the unique machine at the proxy *server*, which
> >> > sends it to the proxy used, which forwards it to Google.
>
> >> If it were 2 random messages, it would mean nothing, but an ass
licking
> >> message from your alter ego followed minutes later by a royal wave of

> >> the
> >> hand from the carriage window from yourself is too much of a 
> >> coincidence.
> >> A
> >> jury of your peers would/has convict you without a second's
hesitation.
>
> >> >>Funny, if he wasn't such an Apple nazi, and had
> >> >> used outlook express, nobody would have noticed.
>
> >> >> > What set me onto it was that there were two message within eight
> >> >> > minutes of each other at 2:46am and 2:54am both Irish time. One
> >> >> > through a South African remailer, one through a Pacific Rim
> >> >> > remailer.
> >> >> > Go figure. And, South Africa is two hours different from Ireland
> >> >> > such
> >> >> > that the time-stamps could not work anyway - nor a Pacific Rim 
> >> >> > time-
> >> >> > stamp of course.
>
> >> >> > It is really too bad. Andre could have made a much more credible
> >> >> > effort simply by going to a local internet cafe or computer
seller
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > ask for a demonstration or some such. He must have been drinking
> >> >> > (more
> >> >> > than usual, that is) to be caught in so transparent a lie. Or he
> >> >> > could
> >> >> > have messed with the time-stamp on his computer making the lie 
> >> >> > less
> >> >> > obvious.
>
> >> >> It is even easier than that (on a PC at least) all you need is a
usb
> >> >> storage
> >> >> key and you can disguise everything other than your IP address and
> >> >> that
> >> >> is
> >> >> what proxies are for
>
> >> >> > Equally too bad that the Italian Sock-Puppet e-mails are so far
> >> >> > back -
> >> >> > it might have been possible to discern the origin of them as
well
> >> >> > very
> >> >> > likely putting Andre into another lie.
>
> >> >> What was the sockpuppet's name? very little gets lost on the 
> >> >> internet,
> >> >> it
> >> >> may still be possible to check.
>
> >> >> > Ah, well...
>
> >> >> > Peter Wieck
> >> >> > Wyncote, PA
>
> >> >> Jootie has been caught by his unique mixture of arrogance and
> >> >> ignorance,
> >> >> arrogant enough to think that nobody was clever enough to notice,
>
> >> > To notice what, anonymous keefie? You just finished explaining, 
> >> > though
> >> > as always you did only half a job, that the information supplied
> >> > identifies nothing unique.
>
> >> >>and
> >> >> ignorant enough to be unable to do anything about it.
>
> >> > I don't need or want to do anything about it. I asked Gray to help
me
> >> > set a trap for you self-declared "computer experts" and have 
> >> > succeeded
> >> > in making you lot look foolish beyond my fondest expectation. I 
> >> > expect
> >> > to make you look even more foolish in the rash of mutual 
> >> > incrimination
> >> > and self-justification and pure simple hysterics which will now 
> >> > follow
> >> > as day follows night.
>
> >> yearh right. You have been caught bang to rights Jooty baby. You
could
> >> always claim it was your twin brother wot done it and you were 
> >> pedalling
> >> your dutch bike through Bantry at the time, it would be just as
> >> believable.
>
> > You're tenth-rate as a stalker as well, Richardson. In the last week
> > you got my birthdate wrong several time.
>
> Oh dear, please accept my grovelling apologies.
>
> > Now you appear not to know
> > that I make a habit of setting traps for undesirables like you, in
> > which they expose their true motives. Everyone else knows that I
> > trapped Krueger, several times, and Pinkerton about fortnightly for a
> > couple of years on end, and Pasternack, and before that the entire
> > Magnequest S***, and some clowns whose names I've forgotten.
>
> > When a tenth-rate mind like yours can as much as catch me breathing,
> > I'll turn into a chinaman.
>
> Say after me "Ying tong hiddle eye fo"
>
> >> >> Keith
>
> >> > Welcome to Professor Jute's online motivational psychology 
> >> > laboratory,
> >> > Keefer. Mind that some of the other rats don't mistake you for
lunch.
>
> >> > If you've wondered why I'm called The Boss, you're about to find
out.
>
> >> The only one to call you the boss is one Andre Jute, under whatever
> >> pseudonom he happens to be using at the time.
>
> > Ah, wishful thinking. Isn't it a fine thing?
>
> It must be, you seem to find it most satisfying.
>
>
>
> >> > Andre Jute
> >> > Visit Jute on Amps athttp://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/
> > And here Keith Richardson childishly changed this:
> > ***
> > "wonderfully well written and reasoned information
> > for the tube audio constructor"
> > John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare
> > "an unbelievably comprehensive web site
> > containing vital gems of wisdom"
> > Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review
> > ***
> > into this
> >> "an unbelievably trite piece of self serving trivia"
>
> > One has to wonder if Keith Richardson, whom none of us have ever heard
> > of, really thinks his opinion is worth more than that of John Broskie
> > or than HI-Fi News & Record Review. In fact, one has to wonder why
> > even Keith Richardson considers Keith Richardson's opinion worth ****.
>
> One wonders why Andre Jute keeps every complement ever paid to him and 
> feel
> the need to pareade tham in every post that he makes (inferiority
complex
> perhaps?)
>
> >> Keith Richardson
> >> Not anonymous after all
>
> > I notice you post from Australia, Richardson. As an
>
> ...
>
> read more »