Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

"Andre Jute" <fiultra@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:766a5c48-26fb-403f-b191-80a06fbb4cf5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "keithr" <kei...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, who has now been stung into telling
> us his name is Richardson, wrote:
>
>> "Andre Jute" <fiul...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:6d5275cf-244b-41e8-b72e-a7d6d571f2a8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> > Anonymous "keithr" <kei...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> "Peter Wieck" <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
>>news:7e146691-3e55-4efa-9630-a2108c0f7013@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> On Mar 17, 3:19 pm, flipper <flip...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:29:33 +0200, "Iain Churches"
>>
>> >> >> <Iai...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >"Peter Wieck" <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >>
>news:b2884b82-ee97-487a-a319-095efdd2f0e2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> >> >> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; 
>> >> >> >> en-us)
>> >> >> >> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
>> >> >> >> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
>>
>> >> >> >From where do you get this info, Peter?
>>
>> >> >> In Outlook Express, right click on the message in the preview
pane 
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> select properties, then the details tab.
>>
>> >> > Yep. That's the way. Each reader has its own very similar system, 
>> >> > but
>> >> > the end-results are the same.
>> >> > Every machine has a unique signature which cannot be disguised by 
>> >> > the
>> >> > "typical" anonymous remailer - at least not since 9/11. One cannot

>> >> > get
>> >> > (easily) to a location or an original e-mail address, but one can
>> >> > determine whether the same machine sent various messages.
>>
>> >> I think that you actually mean an anonymous proxy rather than
>> >> remailer,but
>> >> that is a quibble, the effect is the same.
>>
>> > Where do you get the infernal cheek from to call yourself a "computer
>> > expert" and waste our bandwidth for weeks now with your computer
>> > inanities, anonymous keifer?
>>
>> I don't actually recall ever calling myself a computer expert Andre,
but 
>> if
>> I have done then undoubtably you will be able to provide the reference.

>> On
>> the other hand, having been gainfully employed in the industry for 38 
>> years
>> does confer some degree of knowledge of the subject.
>>
>> > Quite contrary to what you say, it is a
>> > proxy server *and* it anonymises the mail and remails it to the proxy
>> > it has found. It is not a quibble.
>>
>> It may be both a proxy and remailer, but as you were posting via google
>> groups and using Safari then it was being used as a proxy at that time.
>>
>> > It is what protects Gray and me from s*** like you and Worthless
Wiecky
>> > harassing our ISP.
>>
>> Definition: S*** - anybody who dares to question Andre Jute's authority

>> on
>> any subject.
>
> Definition of S***: Overage, overweight, overwrought schoolyard
> bullies running around the net in packs picking on victims. Behaviour
> especially prevalent among failed "engineers" and their hangers-on
> among the jumped-up janitors.

Funny because I would say that your tactics are bullying in the extreme "I

suggest you **** off right smartly, before I turn you into lunch."
friendly 
greeting? No?

>> Now why would I want to harrass your ISP? In almost 20 years of using
the
>> internet, the only IPSs that I have ever corresponded with have been my

>> own.
>
> Gee, ****, Richardson, you must be a better class of engineer than
> some of the s*** we're used to on RAT, who thought nothing of faking
> letters and sending them in my name and then complaining to my ISP
> about the letters they themselves wrote. Just a pity you still lie so.

please point out any lies contained herin.

>> > It is what
>> > makes poor Worthless Wiecky's touted expose ludicrous. (In addition
to
>> > his errors and/or lies about what the data proves -- below I show
that
>> > the data is "unique" to hundreds of thousands of computers!)
>>
>> >>The headers have nothing to do
>> >> with 9/11, they have been a part of usenet fron the start, just
delve
>> >> back
>> >> in google groups an look at old messages.
>>
>> > I wonder if Worthless Wiecky will apologize to people for telling
them
>> > that lie, or if Poopie, another supposed "computer expert". will
>> > apologize for letting Worthless Wiecky's ignorance pass.
>>
>> >> The information above doesn't actually pin it to a machine since a 
>> >> proxy
>> >> was
>> >> used, however it is unusual enough to make it fairly certain that
both
>> >> messages came from joot.
>>
>> > ROTFLOL. See below about 297,000 "unique" instances.
>>
>> > And, even if you could pin the information to unique machine, guess
>> > what, it would be the unique machine at the proxy *server*, which
>> > sends it to the proxy used, which forwards it to Google.
>>
>> If it were 2 random messages, it would mean nothing, but an ass licking
>> message from your alter ego followed minutes later by a royal wave of
the
>> hand from the carriage window from yourself is too much of a
coincidence. 
>> A
>> jury of your peers would/has convict you without a second's hesitation.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>Funny, if he wasn't such an Apple nazi, and had
>> >> used outlook express, nobody would have noticed.
>>
>> >> > What set me onto it was that there were two message within eight
>> >> > minutes of each other at 2:46am and 2:54am both Irish time. One
>> >> > through a South African remailer, one through a Pacific Rim 
>> >> > remailer.
>> >> > Go figure. And, South Africa is two hours different from Ireland 
>> >> > such
>> >> > that the time-stamps could not work anyway - nor a Pacific Rim
time-
>> >> > stamp of course.
>>
>> >> > It is really too bad. Andre could have made a much more credible
>> >> > effort simply by going to a local internet cafe or computer seller

>> >> > and
>> >> > ask for a demonstration or some such. He must have been drinking 
>> >> > (more
>> >> > than usual, that is) to be caught in so transparent a lie. Or he 
>> >> > could
>> >> > have messed with the time-stamp on his computer making the lie
less
>> >> > obvious.
>>
>> >> It is even easier than that (on a PC at least) all you need is a usb
>> >> storage
>> >> key and you can disguise everything other than your IP address and 
>> >> that
>> >> is
>> >> what proxies are for
>>
>> >> > Equally too bad that the Italian Sock-Puppet e-mails are so far 
>> >> > back -
>> >> > it might have been possible to discern the origin of them as well 
>> >> > very
>> >> > likely putting Andre into another lie.
>>
>> >> What was the sockpuppet's name? very little gets lost on the
internet, 
>> >> it
>> >> may still be possible to check.
>>
>> >> > Ah, well...
>>
>> >> > Peter Wieck
>> >> > Wyncote, PA
>>
>> >> Jootie has been caught by his unique mixture of arrogance and 
>> >> ignorance,
>> >> arrogant enough to think that nobody was clever enough to notice,
>>
>> > To notice what, anonymous keefie? You just finished explaining,
though
>> > as always you did only half a job, that the information supplied
>> > identifies nothing unique.
>>
>> >>and
>> >> ignorant enough to be unable to do anything about it.
>>
>> > I don't need or want to do anything about it. I asked Gray to help me
>> > set a trap for you self-declared "computer experts" and have
succeeded
>> > in making you lot look foolish beyond my fondest expectation. I
expect
>> > to make you look even more foolish in the rash of mutual
incrimination
>> > and self-justification and pure simple hysterics which will now
follow
>> > as day follows night.
>>
>> yearh right. You have been caught bang to rights Jooty baby. You could
>> always claim it was your twin brother wot done it and you were
pedalling
>> your dutch bike through Bantry at the time, it would be just as 
>> believable.
>
> You're tenth-rate as a stalker as well, Richardson. In the last week
> you got my birthdate wrong several time.

Oh dear, please accept my grovelling apologies.

> Now you appear not to know
> that I make a habit of setting traps for undesirables like you, in
> which they expose their true motives. Everyone else knows that I
> trapped Krueger, several times, and Pinkerton about fortnightly for a
> couple of years on end, and Pasternack, and before that the entire
> Magnequest S***, and some clowns whose names I've forgotten.
>
> When a tenth-rate mind like yours can as much as catch me breathing,
> I'll turn into a chinaman.

Say after me "Ying tong hiddle eye fo"

>> >> Keith
>>
>> > Welcome to Professor Jute's online motivational psychology
laboratory,
>> > Keefer. Mind that some of the other rats don't mistake you for lunch.
>>
>> > If you've wondered why I'm called The Boss, you're about to find out.
>>
>> The only one to call you the boss is one Andre Jute, under whatever
>> pseudonom he happens to be using at the time.
>
> Ah, wishful thinking. Isn't it a fine thing?

It must be, you seem to find it most satisfying.

>> > Andre Jute
>> > Visit Jute on Amps athttp://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/
> And here Keith Richardson childishly changed this:
> ***
> "wonderfully well written and reasoned information
> for the tube audio constructor"
> John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare
> "an unbelievably comprehensive web site
> containing vital gems of wisdom"
> Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review
> ***
> into this
>> "an unbelievably trite piece of self serving trivia"
>
> One has to wonder if Keith Richardson, whom none of us have ever heard
> of, really thinks his opinion is worth more than that of John Broskie
> or than HI-Fi News & Record Review. In fact, one has to wonder why
> even Keith Richardson considers Keith Richardson's opinion worth ****.

One wonders why Andre Jute keeps every complement ever paid to him and
feel 
the need to pareade tham in every post that he makes (inferiority complex 
perhaps?)

>> Keith Richardson
>> Not anonymous after all
>
> I notice you post from Australia, Richardson. As an Australian myself,
> I can only say you're an embarrassment to the flag.

You are no more an Australian than Joe Stalin was.

> Unless you know something startling about tubes, Richardson, I suggest
> you **** off right smartly, before I turn you into lunch.

Oooooooooh baby I am in awe of your powers. I built my first tube amp in 
1959, I was part of teams that designed tubed components for radar units
and 
servo drives for large antennae, so I won't be ****ing off smartly, I 
wouldn't even if I knew nothing of tubes.

> You might
> notice that some of the other clowns, like Poopie, are not whole any
> more. They won't ever again be whole, either. They tried to **** with
> me for too long and paid the price. You will too.

Andre, I have been doing this for a long time since long before the
internet 
in the days when bulletin boards stood alone, I have met much bigger and 
badder posters that yourself (although not too many with as big an ego)
and 
I am still whole.

> Andre Jute
> Standing tall for the truth
> And this prophetic truth is worth repeating:
>> > I asked Gray to help me
>> > set a trap for you self-declared "computer experts" and have
succeeded
>> > in making you lot look foolish beyond my fondest expectation. I
expect
>> > to make you look even more foolish in the rash of mutual
incrimination
>> > and self-justification and pure simple hysterics which will now
follow
>> > as day follows night.
>

Crap, you got caught out and are trying to cover your ass.

Tell you what, next time I am in Cork, I'll pop over and look you up. I'll

even buy you a pint of Murpheys.

Keith