Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

On Mar 17, 3:19=A0pm, flipper <flip...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:29:33 +0200, "Iain Churches"
>
> <Iai...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >"Peter Wieck" <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>news:b2884b82-ee97-487a-a319-095efdd2f0e2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> >> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> >> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
>
> >From where do you get this info, Peter?
>
> In Outlook Express, right click on the message in the preview pane and
> select properties, then the details tab.

Yep. That's the way. Each reader has its own very similar system, but
the end-results are the same.

Every machine has a unique signature which cannot be disguised by the
"typical" anonymous remailer - at least not since 9/11. One cannot get
(easily) to a location or an original e-mail address, but one can
determine whether the same machine sent various messages.

What set me onto it was that there were two message within eight
minutes of each other at 2:46am and 2:54am both Irish time. One
through a South African remailer, one through a Pacific Rim remailer.
Go figure. And, South Africa is two hours different from Ireland such
that the time-stamps could not work anyway - nor a Pacific Rim time-
stamp of course.

It is really too bad. Andre could have made a much more credible
effort simply by going to a local internet cafe or computer seller and
ask for a demonstration or some such. He must have been drinking (more
than usual, that is) to be caught in so transparent a lie. Or he could
have messed with the time-stamp on his computer making the lie less
obvious.

Equally too bad that the Italian Sock-Puppet e-mails are so far back -
it might have been possible to discern the origin of them as well very
likely putting Andre into another lie.

Ah, well...

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA