On Mar 13, 5:11 pm, "keithr" <kei...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Bret Ludwig" <bretld...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:8749a873-da3f-43d5-a54e-8fa6e6602388@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > Still, I'd rather Japan stay Japan, China stay China and the
> > White world stay White.
>
> Most of the rest of the world would rather that the septics stayed in
> Septica, infortunately they don't and they tend to travel well armed and
> willing to shoot or bomb anybody they consider not to be with them. What
can
> you say about a country so paranoid that they spend as much on arms as
the
> rest of the world combined.
Good question. Simple answer.
"Jew-jacked".
Believe me I have no use for military adventurism and would prefer US
soldiers set foot nowhere that does not attack us first. We should be
like Switzerland.
How Australia runs itself is not our direct concern so if you want to
let the browns run you out that's your business. Keeping the ****ers
out of America is mine.
But your insularity will get you if you aren't heads up. Patrick
should know and so should all Australians and Americans too, that the
BNP is the British National Party of Great Britain and the NPD is the
Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands, of Germany. They are the
most upfront groups for keeping Britan British and Germany German.
France has the Front National, which is not quite in the same league
but the same concept. The US does not have anything like this now, the
National Alliance which considered itself its equivalent is a much
smaller, more esoteric organization and now nearly defunct anyway.
Australians should have no shame over the Abbos, none, none
whatsoever. But plenty of shame over the liberalism and general
****ness rampant there now. Just as the US should feel shamed over
letting the mestizos run them out of their lands their forefathers
fought and died for.
"When a group of Indians spotted a wagon train of such prospective
settlers unaccompanied by soldiers or experienced scouts, they would
approach with smiles and other indications of friendly intent,
sometimes waving a white flag. Almost certainly there were good
Christian souls in those wagon trains who told their husbands, "Put
away your rifle, you fool! Can't you see that they're friendly? If
you're holding a rifle, that will just provoke them." When the Indians
got close enough to evaluate the situation fully, they either would
strike immediately or mix with the prospective settlers and wait for
the op****tune moment to begin cutting throats and taking scalps. Then,
after a day or so of amusing themselves raping the White women and
listening to the screams of the White men staked out on the ground
with a small fire burning at their crotches, they would move on and
leave the scraps for the wolves and coyotes. Such fools soon enough
were weeded out of those Whites who settled in the plains and survived
Indian attacks, but there seemed to be an inexhaustible supply of them
back East, where the preachers continued pumping new heads full of
dangerous nonsense. It's really too bad that the preachers and other
propagandists of the "noble savage" school didn't head west themselves
to try out their ideas on real savages.
This is the aspect of Scalp Dance that I found most interesting. One
can see some fascinating parallels between the experiences of our
pioneer ancestors and what's happening to us today. Basically we White
Americans today are the same people as those White pioneers pu****ng
west 130 years ago and fighting the Indians for the right to do so.
Probably we're not as tough as they were, because our lives have been
softer than theirs were even before they started west from
Philadelphia or Boston or Baltimore. And dysgenic breeding certainly
must have lowered our quality a trifle: kids who wouldn't have
survived long enough to breed then are the most prolific element in
the overmedicated, overprotected White population today. But still,
today we're about 90 percent of what we were in 1870.
Back then we got our act together and pretty well took care of our
Indian problem. It cost us a huge amount of pain and tears and blood,
but we prevailed. We destroyed the savages, we conquered the land for
our people, and since then five generations of our people have lived
on that land. Today, however, we have problems that in some ways are
very similar to our Indian problem then. The difference is that today
we're not getting our act together.
As I said, we licked the Plains Indians; we gave them a beating from
which they never recovered and never will. Today the mongrels, the
mestizos, pouring across our southern border are related to them, of
course: they're a similar sort of Indian, along with some Spanish
admixture. If we had our act together we'd stop that mestizo invasion
in its tracks, and then we'd clean out every one of them who has
managed to sneak across in the last 50 years, along with all the
descendants of those who sneaked across, regardless of whether they
were born south of the border or north of the border. We'd herd them
back across the border the same way we herded the Plains Indians onto
reservations. And the mestizos would stay south of the border, because
we would stop playing the silly games the U.S. Border Patrol plays
with them today. Even if one did manage to get across without being
shot, what could he do? He would be recognized immediately, just
because he wouldn't be White, and then he'd be shot."
http://www.natall.com/free-speech/fs0106c.html
Now, I admit that's a little extreme. But it's what happened. Do you
want to be the lawnmower, or the lawn?
Call me bad if you want, but I'd rather be the lawnmower.
|
