Re: What's the use of a 192 kHz sample rate?

On Fri, 16 May 2008 20:47:24 -0400, "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>"Eric Jacobsen" <eric.jacobsen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:c0tr245enrbgg4649mrr88jp18da1ttf88@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> You still haven't quantified what you mean by "modest
>> number of correctable and corrected errors".
>
>I've defined it well enough if the goal is not to be excessively
pedantic.

I'll take that as an, "I don't know."

>> You must have missed most of what I've written.
>
>No, much of what you've written is only vaguely connected with practical 
>reality.

Actually, it's the basis to dispute the erroneous statements you've
made, but I'm guessing the engineering is over your head or you'd have
been able to discuss it at that level.

>> You've
>> also avoided the real susbtantive points of the
>> discussion.
>
>No, I've avoided reha****ng well-known technology. I've avoided pedantry.

Or you've avoided having to deal with having made statements.

>>  This is leading me to believe that your
>> understanding of the system isn't very deep.
>
>Your comments lead me to believe that you've never actually tested the 
>digital data from an audio CD against the origional data used to create
it.

Are you suggesting you have?   Do tell.  Be specific about the
methodology and the evaluation metrics.




Eric Jacobsen
Minister of Algorithms
Abineau Communications
http://www.ericjacobsen.org

Blog: http://www.dsprelated.com/blogs-1/hf/Eric_Jacobsen.php