Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Audio > Audio Technology > Re: Are purely-...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 40 Topic 6946 of 7061
Post > Topic >>

Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?

by nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Pearce) May 15, 2008 at 04:14 PM

On Thu, 15 May 2008 15:42:44 GMT, "Earl Kiosterud"
<someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Hi Don,
>
>Suppose we set up an amplitude-modulation system using a multiplier,
except that we reverse 
>the carrier (44.1 KHz) and the baseband audio.  We offset the 44.1 KHz
signal (so it is 
>always positive) but not the baseband -- it's allowed to operate in two
quadrants of our 
>multiplier.  You could say that the carrier is modulating the baseband,
instead of the usual 
>other way around.  The resulting signal would include the baseband
components, and a set of 
>AM sidebands around 44.1KHz, images of the audio components, just as with
CD audio (except 
>there wouldn't be sidebands around 88.2 KHz, 132.3 KHz., etc).  If we
allow our audio to go 
>past 22.05 Khz, we'll have spurious stuff in our baseband frequency
range.  For example, an 
>audio component at 30 KHz would produce a component at 14.1 Khz.
>
>Isn't that the same spurious component (same frequency) we'd get with
aliasing in the case 
>of CD audio?  This system is continuous (the audio isn't sampled -- it's
allowed to change 
>continuously), yet we have a sort of a Nyquist frequency under which our
baseband must stay 
>in order to not get signal components in our output that are ambiguous.
>-- 
>Earl

Let me think about this! I'll do the maths later. I think you are
right that you will get stuff all over the place that you don't want,
but I think I would tend to call them images rather than aliases.

I also suspect that the use of a synchronous demodulator might let you
recover the signals (as you can recover modulation over 100% this
way), meaning that the signals aren't truly jumbled - they just appear
that way. Aliasing is truly there for ever once it happens - there is
no way back.

OK, let me change my mind. I've just used Mathcad to look at this. I
made two FFT spectra - one with 44.1k as the carrier and 3k as the
modulation and the other with 3k as the carrier and 44.1k as the
modulation.

For the first I see a carrier at 44.1kHz, and sidebands at 41.1 and
47.1kHz. Exactly as you expect.

For the second I see a carrier at 3kHz and sidebands at 44.1 and
47.1kHz. Which is exactly as you expect once you know what to expect
;-)

Which will do for me. It would even be a nice way to generate
suppressed carrier AM - just filter away the 3kHz when done
modulating.

d


-- 
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
 




 40 Posts in Topic:
Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-12 17:20:04 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-13 13:23:27 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Richard Crowley&quo  2008-05-12 18:30:30 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Ron Capik <r.capik@[EM  2008-05-13 02:19:50 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 14:35:22 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 14:43:39 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Randy Yates <yates@[EM  2008-05-12 22:40:51 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Chronic Philharmoni  2008-05-13 03:20:57 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 14:47:43 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-14 11:40:18 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 16:48:09 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Chronic Philharmoni  2008-05-16 03:18:07 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EM  2008-05-13 10:40:13 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 03:09:52 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-12 21:37:38 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-12 21:51:38 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 15:25:02 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 15:41:54 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-13 05:49:19 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-15 15:42:44 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 16:14:32 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-15 21:38:09 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 21:56:11 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-15 23:21:20 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-16 06:26:25 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-16 09:57:58 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-15 23:04:12 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EM  2008-05-15 16:46:37 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EM  2008-05-15 16:56:00 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-16 06:28:25 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Randy Yates <yates@[EM  2008-05-13 00:01:50 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-13 16:45:51 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-13 06:20:32 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 15:34:07 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Chronic Philharmoni  2008-05-16 03:06:16 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Ron Capik <r.capik@[EM  2008-05-13 15:37:06 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-13 16:39:50 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Randy Yates <yates@[EM  2008-05-13 12:37:39 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 20:13:30 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-15 20:10:09 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 5 23:06:57 CDT 2008.