Re: What's the use of a 192 kHz sample rate?

"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> "Eric Jacobsen" <eric.jacobsen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:3vlj24l9e1fb1m703e900nbqumbmibdfd6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:42:31 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
>> <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> A properly-operating CD player playing discs in good
>>> condition probably has less than one erroneous sample
>>> per full side (72 minutes). There are a modest number of
>>> correctable and corrected errors.
>>
>> Then they were mighty foolish to add a lot of
>> interleaving and FEC to correct the errors.    Those
>> foolish, foolish engineers.
>
> Your response is completely disconnected from what I said.
>
> If you like to just make disconnected posts, please don't quote mine. 

Given the denigrating comments in other parts of the same post and the
imprecision of your statement, it sounded to me very much like a refute
to Eric's characterization of raw CD errors. The term "modest" is very
imprecise as a quantifier and was used to quantify raw ("correctable")
errors. In my opinion the onus was (and is) on you to make your point
more clear.

In any case, stooping to this level of disrespect is offensive and
unnecessary. 
-- 
%  Randy Yates                  % "How's life on earth? 
%% Fuquay-Varina, NC            %  ... What is it worth?" 
%%% 919-577-9882                % 'Mission (A World Record)', 
%%%% <yates@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>           % *A New World Record*, ELO
http://www.digitalsignallabs.com