Re: What's the use of a 192 kHz sample rate?

Mr.T wrote:
> "Eric Jacobsen" <eric.jacobsen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:3vlj24l9e1fb1m703e900nbqumbmibdfd6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:42:31 -0400, "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>> A properly-operating CD player playing discs in good condition
probably
> has
>>> less than one erroneous sample per full side (72 minutes). There are a
>>> modest number of correctable and corrected errors.
>> Then they were mighty foolish to add a lot of interleaving and FEC to
>> correct the errors.    Those foolish, foolish engineers.
> 
> It exactly BECAUSE of those *smart engineers* and their attention to
error
> correction that you DON'T get more uncorrectable errors per disk. Then
we
> WOULD have something to complain about.

Did you think it unlikely that Eric's remark was a bit of sarcasm?

Jerry
-- 
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯