Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Audio > Audio Technology > Re: Are purely-...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 34 of 40 Topic 6946 of 7247
Post > Topic >>

Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?

by "Earl Kiosterud" <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 13, 2008 at 03:34 PM

"Randy Yates" <yates@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:m31w46svgx.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Chronic Philharmonic" <karl.uppiano@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
>> "Randy Yates" <yates@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:m3k5hzj58s.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Green Xenon [Radium]" <glucegen1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi:
>>>>
>>>> Is it true that purely-analog audio devices [such as analog cassette,
>>>> AM radio, and the pre-digital telephone systems*] are immune to
>>>> aliasing?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>
>> Well... AM radio is not immune to aliasing, although we rarely
encounter it
>> in practice
>
> How would AM ever alias?
> -- 
> %  Randy Yates                  % "Midnight, on the water...
> %% Fuquay-Varina, NC            %  I saw...  the ocean's daughter."
> %%% 919-577-9882                % 'Can't Get It Out Of My Head'
> %%%% <yates@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>           % *El Dorado*, Electric Light Orchestra
> http://www.digitalsignallabs.com

An AM radio station operating at 1 MHz would have to have the baseband
limited to 500 KHz, 
or aliases would appear.  For example a 600 KHz baseband component would
appear at 400 KHz. 
This obviously ain't gonna happen in any real world situation, but imagine
an AM station 
operating at 10 KHz.  It would have to keep the audio limited to below
it's Nyquist 
frequency of 5 Khz.

I'm using the term Nyquist frequency somewhat incorrectly, as it
technically applies to 
sampled systems.  But it still works, and we know what we mean! :)
-- 
Earl
 




 40 Posts in Topic:
Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-12 17:20:04 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-13 13:23:27 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Richard Crowley&quo  2008-05-12 18:30:30 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Ron Capik <r.capik@[EM  2008-05-13 02:19:50 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 14:35:22 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 14:43:39 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Randy Yates <yates@[EM  2008-05-12 22:40:51 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Chronic Philharmoni  2008-05-13 03:20:57 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 14:47:43 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-14 11:40:18 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 16:48:09 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Chronic Philharmoni  2008-05-16 03:18:07 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EM  2008-05-13 10:40:13 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 03:09:52 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-12 21:37:38 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-12 21:51:38 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 15:25:02 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 15:41:54 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-13 05:49:19 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-15 15:42:44 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 16:14:32 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-15 21:38:09 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 21:56:11 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-15 23:21:20 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-16 06:26:25 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-16 09:57:58 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-15 23:04:12 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EM  2008-05-15 16:46:37 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EM  2008-05-15 16:56:00 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-16 06:28:25 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Randy Yates <yates@[EM  2008-05-13 00:01:50 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-13 16:45:51 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-13 06:20:32 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 15:34:07 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Chronic Philharmoni  2008-05-16 03:06:16 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Ron Capik <r.capik@[EM  2008-05-13 15:37:06 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Don Pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-05-13 16:39:50 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
Randy Yates <yates@[EM  2008-05-13 12:37:39 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-13 20:13:30 
Re: Are purely-analog audio devices immune to aliasing?
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-15 20:10:09 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Sep 7 17:47:31 CDT 2008.