Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Audio > Audio Technology > Re: OT: revenge...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 27 Topic 6939 of 7078
Post > Topic >>

Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology

by "Green Xenon [Radium]" <glucegen1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 9, 2008 at 02:06 PM

Michael Black wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 9 May 2008, Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> 
>> dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>> On May 8, 9:03 pm, "Green Xenon [Radium]" <gluceg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I feel like burning their skins off
>>>> I want to sear their skins with yellow fire
>>>> I want to burn them.
>>>> I want to burn them.
>>>> [they] deserve to be burnt alive
>>>>
>>>> I want to heinously torture and humiliate these sickos
>>>>
>>>> I just wanted to find out where that
>>>> piece of Kathy human kakaa lives
>>>> and burn her alive
>>>>
>>>> I really have a hard time not wi****ng
>>>> harm on cold-hearted scum like
>>>> Creative Technology and its "Catherina".
>>>>
>>>> Burn Catherina and Creative Technology.
>>>
>>> It now sounds to me that regardless of the real
>>> or alledged mental issues that may or may not exist,
>>> Radium has now crossed the line by committing what
>>> appears to be criminally actionable offenses, including
>>> quite explicit threats of physical harm and death to one
>>> or more individuals.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Wi****ng harm does not equate to threats. In no part of my post did I 
>> say that I am going to attack anyone. I just posted what I would like 
>> to do to them, not what I plan to do to them. There is a big
difference.
>>
> Kid, you didnt' say "I wish an anvil would fall on their head", you said
> "I want to burn...".
> 
> You conveyed what you wanted to do, not something you wished would
happen.
> 
> Of course you're an idiot, and hopefully this actually won't mean 
> anything.  But, if you'd ever see someone who had been burned you'd
> never wish it on anyone in the world.  I saw someone immolate himself
> 34 years ago, and I would never even wish that on someone.
> 
> Of course, even being an idiot does not make you "safe".  One of the
major
> net kooks went out and got a gun and killed three or four people back
> in 1992, and though at the ripe old age of 67 he's tapered off, he has
> continued to spew during his life sentence, getting someone to post
> for him.  Presumably he was dismissed as just a kook, something that
> looks quite different after he killed those people.
> 
> You've just conveyed how juvenile you are, as if your nonsense posts
> over the years didn't do that.  You think someone who likely doesn't
> know any technical details should provide help to you (and given your
> posts are usually nonsense and we don't think you deserve an answer,
> do you really think some company should waste time on you?), yet
> then you want to hurt her.  Nothing warrants that level of hurt,
> but even if there was something so im****tant that such hurt was
> warranted, some silly technical question comes absolutely no
> where near that need.
> 
> Your sense of the world really is skewed.
> 
>    Michael
> 
> 


Okay, several things.

People responding to me, said that my original post stated I wanted to 
kill people at Creative Technology. Feel free to quote when and where I 
said anything about wanting to kill anyone. I just wish for them to be 
punished -- not killed.

I've seen a person being burned alive in the movie "Death Warrant", 
where an undercover officer acts as an inmate to fight corruption 
perpetrated by the prison guards. You're right in saying, I was 
terrified by that scene. But what saddened me was the non-thermal 
injuries the guy suffered -- he tried to break out of glass windows of 
the prison cell.

There are times when I wouldn't mind being burnt alive either, believe 
it or not. However, as I said before, no one being burnt should suffer 
any non-thermal injuries -- there should be no explosions, 
smoke-poisoning, etc. etc. -- and the source of the burn wounds should 
be the bare skin contacting open yellow fires. There should be no 
injuries caused by anything other than the fire as such injuries [not 
caused by the fire itself] really make me sad.

So when I am able to think logically, I don't wish for anyone to be 
burnt or otherwise injured. It's only when I'm frustrated that I wish 
for bad things to happen to those who make me frustrated.

The burn wounds I wish on those who pester me are not possible because 
most burns by fireare almost always accompanied by thermal injuries not 
resulting from contact with the flame and are also accompanied by 
non-thermal injuries. Hence, the injuries I wish for my enemies to 
suffer is in fact impossible.

Here is the type of wounds I wish for my enemies to suffer. These 
injuries violate many laws of physics and thus are only a figment of my 
imagination. The NSA/CSS are an example of my enemies:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.2600/msg/349fa4c99142f19b

As painful as such fire burns are, I wouldn't mind experiencing them 
myself, as long as there are no other injuries at all. There should also 
be no inflammatory response, infection, or scarring.

Please note: In the link, I am simply exaggerating expressions of how I 
wish I could take revenge. Second, and more im****tantly, the way I would 
like to torture those sickos is impossible given the state of today's 
technology, and will probably always be impossible. Any 
biologist/neurologist will tell you that. If an individual did not have 
inflammatory reactions to foreign bodies [such as the dead tissue in 
burn wounds], he/she would've died long ago from infection. My revenge 
fantasy is full of science fiction so you have nothing to fear.

Now, one might say, anyone with fantasies like mine is likely to turn to 
more practical schemes eventually. Nope. Not in my case. I like the 
impossible. I want things I know can't have. So once again, there is 
nothing to fear about me.

BTW, if Catherina didn't have anything good to tell me, then she 
should've just kept quiet and not answered me at all. When you ask a 
company about one of its products, you expects an answer about the 
product, not some nonsense about your question being removed because it 
was posted to different forums.

If I do -- in reality -- take any revenge against Creative Technology, 
it will not involve any physical injury or death. All it will consist of 
is me spamming their live chat rooms with extremely obscene and 
disgusting ***ual content. The spam will be text-only and will consist 
of ***ually-suggestive stories that will make the readers want to beat 
me up. That's only if I actually do take revenge on them. Currently, I 
don't have the time or energy to do this.
 




 27 Posts in Topic:
OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-08 18:03:44 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-05-09 02:30:00 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-08 20:29:34 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
dplatt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 18:37:22 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-08 20:39:24 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-08 20:58:58 
Re: revenge against Creative Technology
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-09 13:50:24 
Re: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-08 20:26:42 
Re: revenge against Creative Technology
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-09 15:51:40 
Re: revenge against Creative Technology
"Richard Crowley&quo  2008-05-08 23:55:14 
Re: revenge against Creative Technology
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-09 08:09:33 
Re: revenge against Creative Technology
"Earl Kiosterud"  2008-05-09 11:53:52 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EM  2008-05-09 05:46:49 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-09 07:49:45 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Chuck <ch@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-09 08:19:27 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Michael Black <et472@[  2008-05-09 15:33:48 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-09 14:06:32 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Richard Crowley&quo  2008-05-09 15:45:41 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-09 16:18:56 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-09 19:13:31 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-05-10 01:46:38 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-05-10 13:50:52 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 15:50:14 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-05-13 19:46:02 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"geoff" <geo  2008-05-14 15:00:15 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Andrew Barss <barss@[E  2008-05-14 19:02:13 
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-05-10 01:20:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 9 8:05:41 CDT 2008.