Mr.T wrote:
> "Green Xenon [Radium]" <glucegen1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:481f7031$0$12932$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Fact, one could sample those crappy FM synth sounds and they would be
>>> audibly indistinguishable,
>>
>> Yes, I know that. I've recorded it myself. I make a stereo recording to
>> a wave file that is 44.1 kHz sample-rate, 16-bit and stereo. I then
>> invert the left channel and then combine it with the right channel. I
>> then get a mono of the sound without what used to be panned to the
>> center. This is how those karaoke voice-cancellers work. I notice,
after
>> this processing I use, the sounds are even better than what they used
to
> be.
>>
>>> yet Radium claims one is audio nirvana and the
>>> other is aural excrement.
>> No. I have nothing against sampling those sounds. However, they've got
>> to be sampled properly.
>
> And from his very next post:
>
>
>> Unfortunately, they've have no problem incor****ating nasty
>> sample-playback MIDI synth -- such as MS GS wavetable SW synth and the
>> Crystal soundfont -- into their soundcards.
>
>
> You do know what a contradiction is right? You can use YOUR own FM
samples
> with those wavetable synths if that's the crap you prefer.
>
>
> MrT.
>
>
Creative Music Synth is the best soundcard-only MIDI synth. However,
it's got is limitations. I would like an upgraded version of Creative
Music Synth that has a sufficient amount of voices, operators-per-voice
and channels to match or surpass the resolution of the most sensitive
human auditory system. I believe the current Creative Music Synth has
only 18 channels. I don't know the exact amount of voices or
operators-per-voice present in CMS, however I don't think it is enough
to cover to surpass the human auditory system.
My enhanced version of Creative Music Synth should have a resolution
that is as good or better than the human auditory system.
Last but not least, my enhanced CMS should be mono and should generate
signals that were not identically-phased in the L and R channels of the
original CMS. Here is why:
I've recorded sound from the original CMS myself. I make a stereo
recording of a wave file [of the CMS sounds] that is 44.1 kHz
sample-rate, 16-bit and stereo. I then invert the left channel and then
combine it with the right channel. I then get a mono of the sound
without what used to be panned to the center. This is how those karaoke
voice-cancellers work. I notice, after this processing I use, the sounds
are even better than what they used to be.
After I use the "voice-cancellation" method, the resulting sound is a
lot sharper, fresher, warmer, crisper, brighter, more rejuvenating --
and otherwise more heavenly -- than what it sounds like if I don't use
"voice-cancellation".
That is why I want my upgraded CMS to generate these signals. These
excellent sounds should be generated in real-time and mono. The reason I
want mono is because I want both speakers to emit the same sound.
|
