Re: What's the use of a 192 kHz sample rate?

dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 4, 2:11 am, "Green Xenon [Radium]" <gluceg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> > dpierce.cartchunk....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > > On May 3, 7:11 pm, "Green Xenon [Radium]" <gluceg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > wrote:
> > >> Shouldn't a 96 kHz sample-rate suffice for that?
> > > A bit of time with a search engine might turn up the answer.
> >
> > Unfortunately, no. I've done as my of my own research on this subject
> > and still don't understand why a 96 kHz sample-rate is inadequate. I
> > still don't understand why a 192 kHz sample-rate is at all necessary.

> A bit of time with a search engine might turn up the answer.

He could start with the rationale given by Meridien for developing
DVD-Audio
in the first place


http://www.meridian-audio.com/w_paper/Coding2.PDF

which I find rather weak, myself.  As did Meyer & Moran when it was
puiblished in JAES...it 
was an impetus for their long-term mult-listener study on DSD vs Redbook.



-- 
-S 
maybe they wanna rock.
maybe they need to rock.
Maybe it's for the money?  But That's none of our business..our business
as fans is to rock 
with them.