Re: What's the use of a 192 kHz sample rate?

On May 3, 10:34 am, rickman <gnu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Do you have any "proof" that no one can hear the difference?

Wrong question. That's not the way it works.
Can I PROVE the mnoon is not made of green
cheese, and that NO part of the moon is made
of green cheese? Nope, rather the proof is up to
those who claim it is. Can I PROVE that NO human
can self-levitate? Nope: it's not the job of me or anyone
else to prove that YOUR extraordinary claim is false,
it's YOUR job, YOUR responsibility, if you want to
be taken at all seriously, to prove the extraordinary
claim.

Do YOU have ant proof that one can hear such
differences? No anecdotes, no "I had a dealer friend
who ...," rather verifiable,  repeatable, credible proof.

Given the extraordinary amount of science and
engineering that has been spent testing and
describing acoustical psychophysics, for someonem,
such as yourself, to come along with a claim that,
on its face, seems to contradict well over a century
of research, seems to constitute an extraordinary
claim.

Fine, you may be right. But it's not up to the rest
of the worl to prove you wrong, it's up to you to provide
the proof you're right.

That's the way science and technology are
SUPPOSED to work. Unfortunately, these pronciples
and methods are rather inconvenient for much of the
audio world.

To f***ing bad.