Re: Is 44.1 KHz sample-rate enough? Yes and No.

Richard Crowley wrote:
> "WindsorFox<SS>" <darkshado666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:fvctnr$uuv$3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Richard Crowley wrote:
>>> "WindsorFox<SS>"  wrote ...
>>>>    You seem to be reading through an alternate universe. Care to
address 
>>>> my reply in the other thread?
>>> Huh?
>> Richard Crowley wrote:
>> And you apparently are ignoring the fact that your
>> misstatement went on your permanent record (i.e.
>> Google Groups Archive). Misstatement of facts
>> should not go unchallengd in the record.
>>
>>   I asked that you provide what I made as a "misstatement."
> 
> IIRC, the statement was addressed to the person who
> made the misstatement.  Were you feeling guilty, too? 
> 
> 

    Then you should click reply on the message from the person you 
intend the reply for.

-- 

"I've also noted that a couple of my regular spammers
have pretty much switched over to phi****ng and 419s
from pecker pills and sawdust tablets."   -   Bar0