Re: Is 44.1 KHz sample-rate enough? Yes and No.

"Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote...
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> They tried that with SACD and DVD-A and they both flopped in the 
>> marketplace, and failed scientific tests designed to see if they made
an 
>> audible difference.
>
>
> SACDs suck. There is just too much clipping in them -- 

Then you haven't been paying attention to what typical
audio CDs have on them.

> due to the 1-bit limit of resolution. If you want professional-quality 
> audio, you need at least 24-bits of resolution. Even 16-bit is too low.
16 
> bits can handle only up to 96 dB without clipping. 24-bits can handle a 
> stunning 144 dB without distortion.

Now you're just being silly. No CDs have "1-bit resolution".
None. Nada. Not a single one.  You appear to be confusing
a popular kind of D/A conversion which is called "1-bit".

> No DSD or SACD for me. No thanks. What a waste of money and a big
earache 
> from all those nasty flat tops.

But since you only listen in monaural, I'm surprised you even
 noticed.