Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Audio > Audio Technology > Re: WMA vs FLAC
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 29 of 58 Topic 6901 of 7074
Post > Topic >>

Re: WMA vs FLAC

by don pearce <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 23, 2008 at 10:43 AM

Mr.T wrote:
> "don pearce" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:SoCdnbLMuvO7ZJPVnZ2dnUVZ8ternZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>    That wasn't an option. Exact Audio Copy is what the program is
and
> I
>>>>> guess it offers an archiving feature. I've had a couple of people
>>>>> recommend it as making the best quality cd copies and rips of any
> other
>>>>> app available.
>>>>>
>>>> If you are ripping a CD, they use Linear PCM, so Exact Audio Copy
will
>>>> give you a LPCM archive - that is the only option.
>>>>
>>> Of course they can save the LPCM file without conversion, but most
> ripping
>>> programs will also use a codec before saving the file to disk, if you
> select
>>> that option. EAC can call many external codecs, or seamlessly use a
> codec
>>> .DLL like LAME for example. So saying it is the "only" option is not
> exactly
>>> correct since the data need not even be saved to disk before
conversion,
>>> given sufficient memory, which most computers have these days.
>>>
>>>
>> You are quite right. I was thinking of using EAC for its intended
>> purpose, the exact copying of CDs.
> 
> 
> Yes, but you should realise that many/most users simply want a
glitchless
> copy to convert to MP3, or some other format.
> It's "intended purpose" is BOTH functions, that's why they provide them
> both!
> 
> MrT.
> 
> 

I would have to say that its intended purpose is "what it says on the 
tin". The other stuff like compression is provided because it is easy, 
and they may as well do it.

d
 




 58 Posts in Topic:
WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-21 21:13:47 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"geoff" <geo  2008-04-22 16:39:05 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-04-21 22:21:38 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
Bob Woodward <"Bo  2008-04-22 10:01:13 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mark D. Zacharias&q  2008-04-22 06:19:48 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-22 09:11:55 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-04-22 12:55:29 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
Jocelyn Major <majorj@  2008-04-22 16:35:03 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Richard Crowley&quo  2008-04-22 16:17:41 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-22 18:46:21 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
Jocelyn Major <majorj@  2008-04-22 20:07:49 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-04-22 18:30:59 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
Chris Hornbeck <chrish  2008-04-23 01:43:24 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-23 11:35:53 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Green Xenon [Radium  2008-04-23 13:42:28 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-23 18:58:51 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-22 18:30:17 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"geoff" <geo  2008-04-23 10:32:40 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-22 09:03:17 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EM  2008-04-23 15:04:32 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Richard Crowley&quo  2008-04-21 21:51:44 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
Eeyore <rabbitsfriends  2008-04-22 12:31:36 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-22 09:18:45 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
don pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-04-22 15:21:31 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-22 12:49:06 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-23 18:47:48 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
don pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-04-23 09:53:56 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-23 19:19:41 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
don pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-04-23 10:43:59 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-23 21:03:19 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
don pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-04-23 12:26:12 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-23 21:40:59 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
don pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-04-23 12:41:34 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-23 21:52:17 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
don pearce <nospam@[EM  2008-04-23 12:53:35 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-23 11:39:39 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-24 12:14:20 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-24 15:12:27 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-25 11:39:59 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-24 21:21:21 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-25 13:34:10 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-25 19:51:29 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-25 16:44:59 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-23 11:38:24 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-25 19:48:16 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"geoff" <geo  2008-04-28 09:59:11 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-28 12:38:30 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-27 22:44:01 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Richard Crowley&quo  2008-04-28 18:59:57 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-28 22:11:40 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Richard Crowley&quo  2008-04-29 06:21:20 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-29 11:43:52 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-05-13 19:49:37 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
dpierce.cartchunk.org@[EM  2008-04-23 05:10:54 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-23 11:41:11 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
dizzy <dizzy@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-23 23:04:33 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"Arny Krueger"   2008-04-22 09:41:46 
Re: WMA vs FLAC
"WindsorFox<SS>  2008-04-22 09:16:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 9 2:05:12 CDT 2008.