Re: How can 2pid get things so wrong...

On May 16, 8:34=A0am, "BretLudwig" <bratziru...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> ****R : >>"Using your model here, we should be ditching the M-16 in
favor
> of a
> high-tech rifle replacement (after all, you're not going to ask a
> front-line infantry soldier to "strap one on", are you? They are 1960s
> technology.), spending tons to develop the replacement for the M-1
> Abrams tank (ditto an armor soldier), new Combat Engineer vehicles,
> new nuclear ballistic missile subs, and on and on and on."<<
>
> =A0I'd definitely ditch the AR-15/M16 rifle (except for the specialized
us=
es
> for which it had been developed) in favor of something more
intrinsically
> reliable in dirty conditions and firing a more manstopping round than
the
> inadequate .223

I wasn't surprised that 2pid was wrong.

I'm about as not surprised that Bratzi is too... ;-)