"Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-8F6222.17435916052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <yKSdnQ3CtqP9tLPVnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-01509F.17343616052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > In article <x_-dnXr517r7uLPVnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >>
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-0539CC.14504416052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> net
>> >>
>> >>> As I said before, I hope that you enjoy that "music".
>> >>
>> >> How is it any less like traditional live music than
>> >> listening to a stereo?
>>
>> > That's not the point,
>>
>> Really?
>
> Yes. It's a given that listening to a stereo isn't like live music.
>
>>
>> > but "at least" most recordings of
>> > music of the type we're writing about have human
>> > performers.
>>
>> I don't think we are that far from software that can pass the Eliza
test
>> for
>> emotion in music.
>
> What's the Eliza test?
LOL! If he really knew anything about psychology, he wouldn't hold the
Eliza
program up as a "test" for anything?
It was a sophomoric little computer program writen to ask open ended "how
do
you feel about that" questions keying on certain response structures.
Nobody would mistake it for a real discussion with a psychiatrist,
although
occassionally it would hit upon a sequence of two or three responses that
might pass for 'real".
So now we know Arny holds up random music as his model.....who knew?
|
