by Jenn <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 16, 2008 at 05:43 PM
In article <yKSdnQ3CtqP9tLPVnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-01509F.17343616052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <x_-dnXr517r7uLPVnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-0539CC.14504416052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> net
> >>
> >>> As I said before, I hope that you enjoy that "music".
> >>
> >> How is it any less like traditional live music than
> >> listening to a stereo?
>
> > That's not the point,
>
> Really?
Yes. It's a given that listening to a stereo isn't like live music.
>
> > but "at least" most recordings of
> > music of the type we're writing about have human
> > performers.
>
> I don't think we are that far from software that can pass the Eliza test
for
> emotion in music.
What's the Eliza test?
