In article
<c23d7f22-8699-4a11-b646-b7e6a3b5b38a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
ScottW <ScottW48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 16, 1:10 pm, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > "ScottW" <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >
> > news:0a3e166c-236c-44e3-8b7e-8a7eff7841d1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > Do any two performances, even by the same conductor,
> > > sound the same?
> >
> > Chances of something as long and complex as an orchestral work
sounding the
> > same = 0.
> >
> > Even short solo pieces are easy to ABX from performance to
performance.
> >
> > > We're talking about replicating. Even a recording won't
> > > sound the same as the original.
> >
> > Depends on how you define the origional. If you define the original
as
> > being the electrical signal going into the recorder than the
possibilities
> > of "sounds the same" are good.
>
> The original sound.
>
> > However the action of microphones and mixing
> > are easy to pick out in a close listening test.
>
> Exactly. So it seems that to recreate the original sound, the best
> way is to use the original instruments. The players and conductor
> (not really required) appear to be technically replaceable with
> automatons.
>
> ScottW
As I said before, I hope that you enjoy that "music".
|
