On May 15, 7:07=A0pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
<artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 15, 8:59=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 15, 2:05=A0pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > > =A0ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On May 15, 12:06=A0am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > >
<80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=
,
>
> > > > > =A0ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > > >
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_l=
d_wr...
>
> > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> > > > =A0Simple subroutine. =A0 This is just a matter of time.
>
> > > Well, enjoy that music.
>
> > Millions do every day.
> > So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?
> > If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed
> > to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?
>
> There is more to conducting than the performance. The rehearsals play
> into it as well. I recall hearing an LP that had the conductor
> (Walter? Furtwangler?) leading the orchestra during a rehearsal and
> explaining how he wanted it done. Jenn can surely talk about this with
> more expertise than I can, but to think that an orchestra performance
> could be replicated by a robot is purely imbecilic.
>
> Next up from 2pid: how robots can produce great works of literature.
That would be reproduce, once again your inability to comprehend the
topic is limited. Robotic reproduction of literature happens every
day.
ScottW
|
