On May 15, 8:59=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 15, 2:05=A0pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > =A0ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On May 15, 12:06=A0am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > >
<80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > > > =A0ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > >
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_ld_=
wr...
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> > > =A0Simple subroutine. =A0 This is just a matter of time.
>
> > Well, enjoy that music.
>
> Millions do every day.
> So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?
> If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed
> to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?
There is more to conducting than the performance. The rehearsals play
into it as well. I recall hearing an LP that had the conductor
(Walter? Furtwangler?) leading the orchestra during a rehearsal and
explaining how he wanted it done. Jenn can surely talk about this with
more expertise than I can, but to think that an orchestra performance
could be replicated by a robot is purely imbecilic.
Next up from 2pid: how robots can produce great works of literature.
Lol LoL lOl LOL!
|
