Re: OT:Hannity and Wm. Ayers

On May 15, 2:51=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 15, 12:39=A0pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> <artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 15, 12:25=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 15, 9:04=A0am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > <artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On May 14, 1:37=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > This ought to be good.
>
> > > > > =A0All kinds of problems are created like more undeserving poor
wh=
en you
> > > > > reward laziness.
>
> > > > What are the distinctions between "deserving" and "undeserving"
poor=

> > > > people?
>
> > > =A0Ask Stephen, he says there are deserving poor.
>
> > > How does he know they're deserving?
>
> > You wrote what I quoted, not Stephen. You asked Stephen about this,
> > not the other way around.
>
> > What a moron.
>
> Inability to follow a thread noted.

Are you talking about this? This is the first mention of anything by
Stephen. Note the punctuation, imbecile:

"Perhaps you missed the implied comparison to Scott's attitude toward
the 'undeserving' poor and ill."

> What a retard.

Funny, I was just thinking the same thing, except the word "imbecile"
came to mind. LOL!

Now you go on to say this:

"All kinds of problems are created like more undeserving poor when you
reward laziness."

"Underserving poor" is *your* quote, 2pid. So what are the
distinctions between "deserving" and "undeserving" poor people? Quit
trying to deflect your stupidity onto others.

Can't follow a thread indeed. What an imbecile. LOL!