Re: Rx for DBTs in hobby magazines ... LOt"S ;-)

> ScottW wrote:
>> JBorg, Jr. wrote:
>>> ScottW wrote:
>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>
>>>> no, you insist that stereophile write DBT reviews.
>>
>>> Tell you what, you go ahead and define my position
>>> for me, point out the fallacies and inconsistencies
>>> in it,
>>
>> Do you make an effort when asking stupid questions,
>> or is it a gift ?
>>
>> There are numerous inconsistencies and fallacies
>> in your position. Number 0ne, in requiring the reviewers
>> to perform dbt audio testing on review samples, the test
>> would not proved anything to me if they fail to detect
>> differences.
>
>  To you.  All I say is it would matter to me.


!

It would matter to you even though the dbt test would
not proved anything whatsoever at all ?

Aside from that hideous response of yours, please clarify
what you meant why it matters to you.





>> Number two, there are cluster of aphids glowing on top
>> of your head. You will need a skillful barber to have
>> them remove. Let him shave your head and have him
>> scrape these clumps of tubules sticking out of your
>> scalp for small, additional fee.
>>
>> Number three, these business of audio testing has gone
>> way over your head that I now think that eating bugs
>> would be a better alternative in helping to keep your
>> mind in check when you aren't so preoccupied with
>> your audio hardware. You should start by tallying the types
>> of bugs available to you in your front yard and have these
>> information ready next time McKelvy rear his ugly head
>> at Rao.
>
>   Why does my opinion of the value of DBT in audio
> reviews send you into such a tizzy?


Because you have an "interesting" position with regard
to audio reviews and DBT.


>  You'd think I hit you with an ESD gun set to 15 kV.

Yes it does.  Now please answer my question above.


> ScottW