Re: OT:Hannity and Wm. Ayers

In article 
<b9a2aa79-aa3d-4fae-870f-31c28a41637a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 ScottW <ScottW48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On May 12, 10:00 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > In article
> > <f14399f4-a3db-469d-a9ab-e2701543c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On May 11, 2:34 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > >
<30dd1aca-a84e-4520-8512-322b77b73...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > >  Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On 11 Mai, 17:15, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > >
<654ff15c-0f56-4a49-92f1-6e36050fc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > > > >  Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On 11 Mai, 16:30, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >
<2a229a73-e386-4870-8952-b67a79ed7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > om>,
> > > > > > > >  Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > On 11 Mai, 15:08, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > lol  I just watched Sean Hannity spend most of a half
hour
> > > > > > > > > > trying
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > link Ayers with Obama.  
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Incredible desperation.  Incredible stupidity.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Politics as usual...
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the off topic...
> >
> > > > > > > > > He is linked to Obama, but not
> > > > > > > > > significantly, and not too recently, as far
> > > > > > > > > as the worswt of it, it was the fundraiser many years
ago.
> > > > > > > > > Bernadine dohrn is even more reprehensible than Mr.
Ayers.
> >
> > > > > > > > > The linkage to wright is much more significant and much
more
> > > > > > > > > troubling.
> >
> > > > > > > > Are you troubled by McCain's links to Hagy?-
> >
> > > > > > > Not nearly as much.
> > > > > > > He is not his pastor.
> >
> > > > > > No, but he did ASK for Hagy's endorcement.
> >
> > > > > > > He didn't perform his marraige ceremony.
> > > > > > > He hasn't been a close friend for twenty years.'
> > > > > > > He didn't feign ignorance of the offence as did Obama.
> > > > > > > Obama's ignorance of Wright's true character spans twenty
years 
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > close personal involvement.
> >
> > > > > > When did Wright start making his odd comments?-
> > > > > Quite a while ago. Some of Wrights sup****ters, in defending him,
> > > > > claimed that the tapes were old. True enough, you can see how he

> > > > > aged.
> > > > > Though they are villifying Wright with old comments, it also
means
> > > > > that Obama has been around this stuff or a long time.
> > > > > As far as recent Wright stuff, you can look at his
> > > > > rants firm the past two weeks.
> >
> > > > I don't know how much Obama has been exposed to that stuff, and no
one
> > > > else seems to know either.  The big point is that there is
absolutely 
> > > > no
> > > > linkage to Obama holding these thoughts.
> >
> > >  We need to bring forth the mind reader.
> >
> > > > So far, the right wing's main
> > > > "weapon" against Obama seems to be things his PASTOR has said
(does
> > > > McCain have a pastor, BTW?) and that fact that he knows Ayers.
> >
> > >  It would be nice if Obama were really forthcoming on what he
> > > believes.
> >
> > He has been.
> 
>   He believes we need a change. Wow, that's really forthcoming.
> >
> > > All I hear are meaningless plattitudes.
> > > He says his policies are documented on his web site. If that's
> > > it...the guy couldn't get a small business loan as his plan would be
> > > considered to vague.
> >
> > He's "at least" as specific as any other candidate at this stage of
the
> > game.
> 
>  No, he's absolutely the least specific and he specifically tells his
> callers not to
> get into policy details when they solicit votes.  Refer them to the
> web site where there is enough to satisfy any political geek is what
> the trainees were told.
> Well I looked. It isn't at all illuminating.
> I think this lack of specifity as a political tactic should be
> rejected by voters on principle.  We need leaders who will their
> positions and principles up for a vote.
> Not their good looks and vague speeches.
> 
> ScottW

On what issue is McCain more specific than Obama?  Please site examples.