Re: Rx for DBTs in hobby magazines ... LOt"S ;-)

On 11 Mai, 23:44, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 11, 12:50=A0pm, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 11 Mai, 15:06, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 11, 12:00=A0pm, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On 11 Mai, 14:52, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 11, 11:05=A0am, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
>
> > > > > > On 11 Mai, 10:31, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > You don't need to be a racer to understand how races can be
*f=
ixed*.-
>
> > > > > > So, Scott never auditions audio equipment?
>
> > > > > =A0I auditioned my Quads though not in my home.
> > > > > I've never "auditioned" equipment in my home.
> > > > > I've always had to purchase it first.
>
> > > > You certainly do comparative listening.
>
> > > =A0Occasionally at shops and at home on stuff
> > > I've bought.
>
> > I just fail to see the logical connection whereby you
> > will buy stuff without even having ever heard it, and
> > yet you object to reviews based upon opinions.
>
> =A0No really. I object to reviews that always find wonder
> where there is none.
>
> > According to your criteria, you don't even need reviews at all,
> > DBT or otherwise.So its nothing to you,
>
> =A0Now you got it. S'phile is nothing to me. =A0All I've ever said is
> I would those BS pontifications a bit more credible if they
> had some DBT proof with 'em.
> Without it, they're just another opinion with the stench of
> corruption wrapped around 'em. =A0I can find less biased
> opinions elsewhere so I have no need.
>
> > unless you just want to
> > play the role of audio nanny.
>
> =A0I'm not insisting you share my opinion.
> Why do you seem so distressed that I don't
> share yours, Nanny?
>
> ScottW-


has nothing to do with your or my opinions.
it has to do with your selected role as Self Proclaimed
Protector of The Audio Consumer