On May 11, 11:49=A0am, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 11 Mai, 12:40, George M. Middius <cmndr_geo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > After Bush invaded Iraq, you said it was the right thing to do because
> > they had WMD they might use on us. Then when there weren't any WMDs,
you=
> > said invading Iraq was the right thing to do because Hussein & Sons
were=
> > evil psycho mass-murderers. It was pointed out to you that the U.S.
has
> > never officially adopted a policy of invading countries to get rid of
ev=
il
> > psycho dictators, but you said the invasion of Iraq was still the
right
> > thing to do.
>
> > So here we are again, face to face with evil psycho mass murderers,
this=
> > time in Myanmar (formerly Burma). Tens of thousands are suffering and
> > dying because the evil psycho junta refuse to save them. Time to
invade!=
> > Topple the evil dictators! Bring democracy and enlightenment to the
> > people! Right?
>
> > (Note to Scottie: BARKBARKYAPYAP! GROWL! WOOF-RUFF-WOOF!)
>
> Here we go again.
> Iraq: Saddam invaded Kuwait. We invaded Iraq.
No, we didn't.
>=A0We were winning.
> Iraq agreed to terms. Iraq violated terms. We went back in.
Oh, the "They violated the no-fly zone!" defense.
That was something like #15 on the original list.
> Myanmar: Did not invade their neighbor.
Toppling an oppressive regime and bringing democracy was something
like reason #5 on the original list. WMD was #1.
That list has ****fted so damned many times though it's hard to keep an
accurate account of where things are now. WMD has dropped off the
list, as has violating the no-fly zone and harboring terrorists. Oil,
probably the real #1, never made it on the list. I think now it's
pretty much down to #15.
So we should invade Myanmar.
|
