Re: Does ANY audio mag use DBT?

On May 10, 2:32=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 10, 12:14=A0pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> <artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 10, 11:16=A0am, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 9, 6:33=A0pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > <artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On May 9, 6:21=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 9, 3:06=A0pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > <artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > On May 9, 3:50=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 9, 10:42=A0am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > > > <artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On May 9, 7:07=A0am, "TT" <TTencerNoS...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wro=
te:
>
> > > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" <ar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > > > > > > >news:yZKdnST58J6IpLnVnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > > > I'm glad you're online, how's my apology coming?
>
> > > > > > > > > BTW was it painful when you had both your feet removed
fro=
m your mouth?
>
> > > > > > > > People like GOIA and 2pid suffer no embarassment when they
a=
re proven
> > > > > > > > dead-wrong.
>
> > > > > > > Shhhtards idea of proof is anything he says.
>
> > > > > > You have, for example, underwhelmed me with your military
'exper=
tise'.
>
> > > > > Still waiting to know how we'll get a 1000 =A0F-16s over the
Taiwa=
n
> > > > > straits.
>
> > > > Still wondering if we would declare all-out war on the Chinese
going=

> > > > against all of our published policies.
>
> > > > This (of course) begs the question of how we'd these aircraft
there,=

>
> > > =A0 I suspect it was you who conveyed our sentiments to Sadam
> > > on his plans for Kuwait.
>
> > > > since according the the USAF they're what shoots down enemy
aircraft=

> > > > even WITH the F-22.
>
> > > =A0But 1000s aren't required with the F-22.
> > > Why do these simple little dots all lined up in a tidy little
> > > row remain disconnected in your silly little brain?
>
> > Go back and reread the study that you posted, 2pid. That's exactly
> > what the USAF said. The F-22 can *track* a large amount of aircraft
> > but cannot *attack* them. It "increases the efficiency" of current
> > aircraft. You still need all of those other aircraft, 2pid, at least
> > according to the USAF study that *you* posted.
>
> =A0But not nearly as many as without the F-22...
> a position you advocate which is not feasible as you won't be
> able to get that many aircraft to the battlefield in question.

So we come full-circle: we have spent well over $200 to develop an
aircraft for one unlikely scenario. That was the question you were
asked. You never did come up with another scenario, even granting this
unlikely one, which requires it.

Yap yap yap.

> > Duh.
>
> > An F-22 can carry a maximum of eight air-to-air missiles. We have
> > about 200 F-22s. Whether we will get any more is in doubt for now.
> > That's 1600 air-to-air missiles, assuming all 200 aircraft are on
> > station during the attack, which is not likely, and assuming a 100%
> > kill ratio, again not very likely.
>
> =A0 Your position started out...the enemy has no answer for the F-16.

No, it was that an F-16 is entirely capable against the aircraft we
are likely to face. There's a difference.

> When that was thoroughly debunked you

That hasn't been. Don't forget the majority of the teeming hordes of
Chinese aircraft are primarily of Korean war vintage. MiG-17s and the
like.

> morphed into the enemy has no answer for 1000 F-16s ignoring that
> we can't get 1000 F-16s to the battlefield, but with a combination
> of F-16s and F-22s a much smaller number of aircraft is a
> significantly
> more credible deterrent.

For a very unlikely scenario.

The argument I made, and which you are too dumb to see (still), is
that it would be better to have five times as many F-16s over fewer
F-22s. We are no longer in the cold war. It is far more likely that we
will be confronted with several smaller conflicts rather than one
large one.

But then again, you advocated that we start developing yet another
generation of fighter now, showing how far up your ass your head
is. ;-)

Do you have a pet door, or does somebody have to let you outside to
poop?