Re: 2pid, I really want to know

On May 10, 12:01=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 9, 6:38=A0pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> <artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Do you really think that you're smart? Do you feel that you're of
> > above-average intelligence, even just on RAO, let alone the world in
> > general?
>
> =A0Do you really think this childish "you're dumb" crap is worth the
> time?

I'll take that as a "No". At least you're being honest.

> =A0I suppose it is when you feel your arguments can't stand for
> themselves.

2pid, you don't know the difference between an "argument" and a
"premise".

For example, your "premise" that the US would declare all-out war on
China for attacking Taiwan and need thousands of aircraft in the
Taiwan Strait bypasses the "argument" of our going against near;y 40
years of published policy and our own economic well-being. China,
after all, owns a fairly large chunk of our economy.

My "arguments" stand just fine. It is your "premises" that are a bit
weak.

> =A0What you don't realize is that you who rush to personal insults
> are the real force behind the demise of this group as an audio forum.

Like when you sought me out to accuse me of having the clap?

Remember the weak, ill-metered 'rhyme' you tried to pass off as art?
What attack from me prompted that?

Lol LoL lOl LOL!