Re: Rx for DBTs in hobby magazines ... LOt"S ;-)

On May 10, 10:35=A0am, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 10 Mai, 13:09, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On May 9, 5:03=A0pm, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On 9 Mai, 16:37, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > =A0Not at all. =A0If some biased reviewer expects me to believe
> > > > his BS pontifications and pay him for it,
> > > > he's gotta provide some proof.
>
> > > No he does not.
>
> > =A0Try to read what I wrote.
> > =A0and if he wants me to pay him for it, he does.
>
> Subscribe to an alternate magazine that does.
> Oops! there aren't any.
> Start your own, after all you just claimed there is a market of
> hundreds of millions
> of potential subscribers.

 Strawmen.
Bottom line is Atkinson and S'phile have a niche
of gullible subscribers that advertisers will pay to
reach.  I don't have to like it and I think it's
generally bad for the hobby.

ScottW