Re: Death to ABXers! Read Testament Here!

"John Atkinson" <stereoeditor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
news:6ba79eb7-c070-4fc5-a084-ce6470cb0d07@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 6, 3:27 pm, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> "John Atkinson" <stereoedi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>
messagenews:bff507ac-b703-4fe0-b6c7-19f9447a9dff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Arny still thinks that the Meyer-Moran AES paper
>>> "proves" there's no need for sample rates greater than
>>> 44.1kHz and bit depths greater than 16.
>>
>> Delusions of mind-reading noted.
>
> No, I was was going by your own statements on the subject,
> made here on r.a.o. Are you saying that you didn't post
> those messages, Mr. Krueger.

No John, you were basing your comments on your inerrant perceptions of
what 
I currently think. If you were using indirect means such as analysis of
what 
I have written, a skilled writer such as yourself would have said that you

were reflecting on what I seem to think, and you wouldn't claim to know
what 
I think right now.

>> I'm still waiting for Stereophile to publish some
>> compelling evidence in favor of the need for > 44/16
>> consumer distribution formats.

> Thank you for your patience, Mr. Krueger. But we have
> done so, in an essay I write that you yourself referred
> to a while back. Perhaps it wasn't you that posted that
> message also?

More delusions of mind-reading noted. I may have referred to some 
error-filled thing that you did in the past, but obviously it was not 
compelling for me.

>> You see to be very willing to demand evidence to sup****t
>> opinions that people never had, while refusing to back
>> up your own.

> Why do I have to offer sup****t for opinions I have formed
> as the result of my experience, Mr. Krueger?

When I read your so-called technical articles John, you always seem to 
remind me of one of the blind men who was trying to describe an elephant.