Re: Does ANY audio mag use DBT?

On Tue, 6 May 2008 13:47:34 -0400, Harry Lavo <hlavo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:boOdnSumW4vZ3L3VnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-9BAD2B.16560205052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In article <McOdnWkS8dy4A4LVnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" <jennconductsREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-D546AB.16115505052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>> If not, are they all worthless?
>>>>
>>>> The technical tests in Stereophile are somewhat useful
>>>> at times.
>>>>
>>>> But as a rule, the high end ragazines are good for a
>>>> laugh, and not much else.
>>>
>>> Do ANY audio magazines use DBTs?
>>
>> Sound and Vision, and before that Stereo Review and Audio.

>I am sorry, but I read Stereo Review and Audio every issue every year
from 
>the early '60's onward and I don't ever recall them using DBT's for 
>testing/reviews.  They may have run a feature on it from time to time,
but 
>that is hardly the same thing. 

agreed.  They used DBT a few times for testing speaker wire and signal
cables and for nothing else.