Re: Death to ABXers! Read Testament Here!

In article 
<86b2fbfb-8baa-4ed4-bca0-060f014af76f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 ScottW <ScottW48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On May 4, 1:25 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > In article
> > <d2e1879a-f457-4e31-9159-877006388...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >
> >  ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >My beef with reviewers is simple.  Their bias extends well
> > > beyond sighted influence to advertising dollar influence.
> >
> > Evidence?
> 
> Green pens, power cables, pingo discs, stardust etc etc etc.

So those are some reviews with which you disagree.  Where is the 
evidence that it was money that influenced them?

> 
> Money is the ultimate bias. When it's involved corruption follows.
> No one is immune.

I see.  So you are against all reviews in all areas, i.e. food, wine, 
concerts, movies, books, etc?

> For example...when you submitted your resume to Mira Costa
> you likely included some significant accomplishments.
> Did you also highlight your weaknesses, your failures,
> your ****ups?
> 
> No? Where's the evidence?

Just about the biggest apples vs. oranges I've yet seen.  I mean 
really...