On May 4, 11:54=A0am, MiNe 109 <smcelr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <d4e6a9c0-3b32-47ef-a763-9eb8da2a7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> =A0ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 4, 7:50=A0am, "Soundhaspriority" <nowh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > "ScottW" <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >
>news:2c20ef45-9143-4968-b3dc-10003832552f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On May 3, 9:19 pm, "Soundhaspriority" <nowh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:>
>
> <snip>
>
> > > The Behringer stuff has been extensively covered in the recording
foru=
ms.
> > > Many like it, and many hate it. Lots of breakage. The way I see it,
mo=
st
> > > "project studio" musicians are not sensitive to sound quality the
way =
we
> > > are, so many of the loves can be discounted.
>
> > Like this one?
>
>http://www.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=3Ddigital&n=3D108244&review=3D=
1
>
> > >The hates, on the other hand,
> > > seem to be informed.
>
> > =A0Yet it's one of a few devices with a relatively new AKM DAC.
> > I'm still waiting for you to identify some alternatives.....
>
> If you don't want to deal with that mod guy on audioasylum,
Mod guy?
> I'd check
> out Slim Devices.
I have. Too much money down the tube for feature I don't want.
I'd go Benchmark first.
>
> Stephen
|
