"ScottW" <ScottW48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2c20ef45-9143-4968-b3dc-10003832552f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
May 3, 9:19 pm, "Soundhaspriority" <nowh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "ScottW" <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
[snip]
I can't comment on Benchmark though, haven't heard one. I'll probably
have to buy one to find out.
Same with the Behringer. Thats why its intriguing, the crapshoot
expense isn't much.
So I'd still be interested in gear you're aware of with these new
DACs.
> Hires masters are another story.
?
ScottW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I mix and master in 24/88, and it sounds better. I don't know whether
having
a good DAC causes me to make better mixes, but at least, I can enjoy it
more
:) Also, since the mix is not normalized until it's ready to be
downsampled, the DAC has to deal with numbers closer to the internal
grunge.
The Behringer stuff has been extensively covered in the recording forums.
Many like it, and many hate it. Lots of breakage. The way I see it, most
"project studio" musicians are not sensitive to sound quality the way we
are, so many of the loves can be discounted. The hates, on the other hand,
seem to be informed.
Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511
|
