Are We the Kurds of the Future?
>>"Let us consider for a moment the Kurds, that nation -- or, in other
words=
, that people -- without a land in the Middle East. The status of the
Kurds,=
who are currently the subjects and pawns of the Iraqis, the Turks, the
Iran=
ians, and others, is of vital interest to White people worldwide -- and
not =
for the reasons you might think.
The Kurds speak an Indo-European language, and an examination of their
physical features shows in an instant that they carry a significant
percentage of European genes, though racial mixture has touched them
as it has most Caucasian peoples on the continent of Asia.
What concerns us today is not their racial or linguistic heritage,
however. What concerns us about the Kurds is the fact that they are a
people without a country.
They are culturally, linguistically, and physically distinct from
neighboring peoples. They have their own language; they have an
historic territory; and -- most im****tant of all -- they think of
themselves as a separate and distinct people. In my view, they
certainly deserve self-determination: they deserve their own country.
But the Kurds have no government of their own. Their homeland is ruled
by overlapping multicultural states dominated by other peoples. In the
part of Kurdistan owned by Turkey, they are essentially powerless
against the Turks. In the part of Kurdistan owned by Iraq, they are
under the thumb of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. In the part of
Kurdistan lying within the borders of Iran, the Iranian state
determines their destiny -- and so on.
Do you think that Kurdish people have much influence in the running of
the multicultural societies they are forced to share? Do you imagine
that Kurdish parents have much say in how their children are educated
in Iranian schools? Is it likely that Kurdish points of view are
fairly presented -- or presented at all -- in the Iraqi or Turkish
media? Do these multicultural states put their armies and air forces
at the disposal of the Kurds to protect Kurdish interests?
Of course not! The military forces of several of these multicultural
states are noted for their attacks on Kurds who had the temerity to
demand freedom and self-determination. In fact, our "ally" Turkey,
through which U.S. aid to the Kurds flows, has already leveled over
2,000 Kurdish villages in what is frankly termed a "depopulation
program."
I should add parenthetically that the United States and its current
criminal managers can take no credit for aiding the Kurds in their
struggle. While our deluded warriors burn Iraqi civilians and soldiers
into cinders, with the transparent excuse that we are aiding the
Kurds, the United States government continues to sup****t and supply
the Turkish forces who kill and oppress Kurds with impunity. What the
slickster and his handlers are really doing is just two things:
1. They are playing balance-of-power politics in the Middle East,
changing targets from time to time, but always aiming our missiles and
bombs at one Moslem state or another to keep all of them weak enough
so that they pose no threat to God=EF=BF=BDs Race in Israel; and
2. They are cynically exposing our soldiers to death and injury
because the Jewish billionaires who own the United States=EF=BF=BD media
hav=
e
made it popular and fa****onable to kill Iraqis, and doing popular
things gets you votes from the boobs.
But back to the Kurds themselves.
My point in bringing them up is this: When we look at the Kurds=EF=BF=BD
present, we are looking at Whites' future. We are the Kurds of the
future.
In every White nation, and especially the United States, White people
are suicidally giving up control of their homelands, the homelands
their ancestors died to procure for us.
We are agreeing to the insane concept of "one biped, one vote," while
simultaneously im****ting millions of our natural enemies. We are even
inciting them into a frenzied hatred of us.
In the United States, we have rejected the idea implicit in the
republic of the founders, the idea that this government was set up to
insure the freedom and independence of a particular people, the people
of European descent in North America and their posterity. In its place
we have accepted the Jewish idea that the purpose of this country is
to supply the bellies, bank accounts, and *** urges of the greatest
possible number of human beings that can squeeze between the Rio
Grande and the 49th parallel.
Such a perversion of the idea of our nation may make a few of us
richer tem****arily. It may momentarily assuage the feelings of guilt
inculcated in White people by the Jewish-controlled media cor****ations
with their billions of dollars. It may somewhat appease the savages
within our gates and buy a few more years of illusory peace.
But Nature is impossible to fool, and her laws cannot be broken. If
you think you can break Nature=EF=BF=BDs laws, you will soon find that
they
can -- and will -- break you.
Nature defines nations, not as legal fictions or geographic
expressions, but as living biological entities, as extended families.
Nations are people bound together by a common history, culture,
destiny, and -- most im****tantly of all -- by common descent and
biological kin****p.
When the separate Black nation on American soil was declared to be
joined to the White American nation after the Jewish-inspired and
Communist-sup****ted "civil rights" revolution, that declaration had no
more effect on reality than the declaration of Charles Manson that he
was Jesus Christ had on Biblical scholar****p.
We continued to have two nations, Black and White, to which have now
been added countless other nations im****ted by our enemies, living
under the same government: a government which cannot serve the
interests of either people since, by definition, those interests will
seldom be identical.
Such a situation serves best that peculiar people whose members always
have been a tiny minority in whatever lands they have inhabited and
who, perhaps reflexively or instinctively, so often work to undermine
homogeneity. They labor assiduously to exchange rule by a vital
majority for balance-of-power politics easily influenced by a
committed and wealthy minority group.
We have voluntarily submitted our nation to rule by others. While we
blabbered the mindless platitudes about "fairness" and "equality" that
our enemies put in our mouths, we voluntarily put ourselves in the
same situation as the Kurds.
We have become a people without a country. We have become a nation
without a government of our own. We have become the Kurds of the
future, a people whose destiny is in the hands of our deadliest
enemies.
This truth is evidenced in a thousand different ways. We are legally
forbidden to favor our own people in hiring, education, and the
disbursement of tax money. We are forbidden, on pain of being fired or
ostracized, to make public statements in sup****t of the survival of
White Americans. We are told not to note that White Americans are
being oppressed and vilified. We are told not to call attention to the
ways in which the Old White America was superior to the new
multiracial feeding and breeding zone which has supplanted it.
Do White Americans have any politicians in Wa****ngton explicitly
standing up for our interests and concerns? How absurd. Of course not!
The criminals currently belonging to the gang calling itself "the
Congress of the United States" owe loyalty only to the multiracial
system that pays them so handsomely. They would rather have a limb
amputated than admit they represent the interests of White people.
Are White Americans able to control the education of their children,
ensuring that our traditional values, our unique history, and the
stories of our heroes are transmitted to the next generation of our
people? To even ask such a question is forbidden in the New World
Order. Schools teach our children that "diversity" and cohabitation
with non-Whites are moral ideals; that Communist enemies of White
America like "Martin Luther" King are heroes; and that not only is
there no difference between the races, but that races do not exist.
Furthermore, the establishment of schools for White children would
most likely be met with the most ferocious legal and media assault
imaginable.
Do White Americans control our media of entertainment and information?
Except for the Internet, which our enemies do not yet control, all
major media in America are dedicated apostles of our national
disappearance and our racial extinction. To pretend otherwise would be
laughable if it were not fatal. Who are the media preparing us to hate
next, after the Iraqis? White separatists in camouflage uniforms,
carrying guns and criticizing Jews, are the new heavies in prime-time
dramas. This is very revealing of exactly who is running the
brainwa****ng transmitters, and it is a chilling reminder of who may be
terminated next in a so-called "surgical strike."
Are the military forces and police agencies of the United States at
the disposal of White Americans for the advancement and protection of
our people and our interests? What did these armed agencies do to
protect the interests of White separatist Randy Weaver? What did these
armed forces do when a few European nations had the temerity to stand
up for the interests of the European race sixty years ago? What would
"our" armed forces have done if Rhodesia and South Africa had
stiffened their spines and fought back instead of surrendering to the
New World Order? No, these armed forces are no more in our hands than
the armed forces of Turkey and Iraq are in the hands of the Kurds.
Unless Whites regain control of our destiny; we are the Kurds of the
future. And the future will be here before you know it. "<<
|
