On Mar 11, 1:15=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mar 10, 9:12=A0pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> <artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Mar 10, 8:32=A0pm, "ScottW" <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
mes=
sagenews:8bb504d9-983f-46cf-ba74-2ef859a38924@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Mar 10, 4:31 pm, ScottW <Scott...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Ah, the "deek and avoid" MO comes to light...again.
>
> > > When cornered, 2pid either disappears or resorts to posting new OT
> > > material in an effort to deflect (in his 'mind' anyway) the
thra****ng
> > > he's getting in other threads.
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> > > If I was cornered I wouldn't have walked away.
>
> > You are cornered logically, 2pid. This is the Usenet.
>
> =A0Yup, people can make all sorts of false claims.
> =A0Like you just did.
Claims backed up by the US Department of State, claims backed up by
military experience (you still refuse to come up with a rational
scenario where we'd need the F-22, or where the cost is justified),
claims that you have not refuted one bit.
> =A0That's why I often use references to sup****t my position
> with facts. =A0Something which you whined about refusing
> to follow links for some time BTW.
All of your OT drivel? Every time we've engaged in 'discussion' you
pout that all I do is insult when you've been destroyed.
So how do you feel about the so-called "three communiques" regarding
Taiwan? Not a fact there, huh, 2pid? LOL!
> You simply don't like facts. It's easy to see
> why. =A0Facts always trump insults which are the
> only thing you've got.
I see.
> Well, insults and a ridiculously trumped up resume the likes
> of which is only seen on usenet.
LOL!
2pid, don't feel bad. I'm sure you've had some small succeses in your
life.
> I never understood why anonymous people think
> claims of a resume amount to anything.
You've posted yours, 2pid. It's not all that impressive.
So let's say I posted my CV (I don't use a "resume", 2pid. If you
don't know what a "CV" is you can look it up). What then? You'll call
references? LOL!
As I said, you're creepy in a stalkerish kind of way. Anyway, here's
the deal: you haven't been able to counter any of my military
arguments. That could be because I have the experience I say I do, or
it could just be that I'm that much smarter than you are. Is the
actual reason that you get your ass handed to you really that
im****tant to you? LOL!
(BTW, 2pid, go back and look at our 'discussion' on tactics for
fighting an insurgency. I argued against FOBs and stated that we
needed to go out and share the risks of the population. You were not
comforatble with that. You thought there was too much risk to our
guys. Have you ever heard of a LOT? LOL!)
Let's see some more:
Message-ID: <1170728386.475683.114790@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I really like this one:
" It doesn't take a military expert to claim you've demonstrated
no military expertise... you don't even atempt to baffle us with
BS... you really offer very little in the way of military
discussions."
And here's another gem from the same post:
"BTW... Paul Hackett was on the local Air America, Stacey Taylor show
this morning... and he said Murtha's claims )as well as the Times
story) on the Haditha marines are
completely false and Murtha made them for political purposes.
Pretty earth shattering to our poor hosts and they just let
it slide.
If Murtha did lie about the Haditha incident for political
purposes...
don't you think there should be an investigation?
Murtha claimed he had inside sources.. "
LMAO!
Message-ID: <1153508883.118313.211260@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I'll wager anybody $100 that 2pid still cannot see that his ass was
handed to him, nor that he could understand why. I'll wager he'd go
back, reread these threads, and have no clue about the expertise they
show (even considering that we are now doing *exactly* what I
advocated).
LOL! Imbecile.
> They must feel their posts just don't have any credibility
> without some additional claims of authority.
That must be it. After all, you said so.
lol Lol LoL lOl LOL!
|
