Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Audio > Audio Talk > Re: Recording a...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 6 Topic 2506 of 2695
Post > Topic >>

Re: Recording at different bit depths/sample rates

by Laurence Payne <NOSPAMlpayne1ATdsl.pipex.com> Jan 1, 2008 at 02:15 PM

On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:44:32 +0100, "Peter Larsen"
<plarsen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>You've had plenty comments, just supplementing with the fact that the 16
vs. 
>24 bits are counted downwards from 0 dB FS, and that the difference
between 
>24 bit and 32 bit audio is that 32 bit audio has 8 more bits "on top".
The 
>advantages of computing in this format are that cpu's do things in 32 bit

>lumps anyway and that the headroom vastly reduces the risk of clipping 
>during processing and mixing.

Sure, compute in a 32-bit space.  In fact, if you're mixing on a
quality DAW program it doubtless does this anyway, without telling you
or giving you a choice!
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Recording at different bit depths/sample rates
Heapdriver <me@[EMAIL   2007-12-31 04:21:53 
Re: Recording at different bit depths/sample rates
Laurence Payne <NOSPAM  2007-12-31 16:00:39 
Re: Recording at different bit depths/sample rates
"Peter Larsen"   2008-01-01 13:44:32 
Re: Recording at different bit depths/sample rates
Laurence Payne <NOSPAM  2008-01-01 14:15:08 
Re: Recording at different bit depths/sample rates
Norbert Hahn <blah.fas  2008-01-01 15:23:57 
Re: Recording at different bit depths/sample rates
"Peter Larsen"   2008-01-01 15:58:13 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Oct 15 21:46:31 CDT 2008.