Re: FS: Digital Multimeter with Backlight, Nice!

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:22:15 -0500, PowerHouse Communications
<PowerHouseCom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:


>"WindsorFox<SS>" <darkshado666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:fu8n58$sup$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> AZ Nomad wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:26:21 -0500, WindsorFox<SS> 
>>> <darkshado666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Bill Golden wrote:
>>>>> "AZ Nomad" <aznomad.3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> WHAT IS THE MAKE AND MODEL?  As long as you fail to include
>>>>>> this minimal information, it is just a junk of chinese noname
garbage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hint:  we don't believe you when you say it is better than a fluke.
>>>>>> And BTW, its specs suck.  1% to 6% accuracy?  Give me a break.  It 
>>>>>> might
>>>>> as
>>>>>> well be a 2 digit meter.  Reminds me a sinclair LED meter from the 
>>>>>> 70's.
>>>>>> The last digit is just noise.
>>>>> What you choose to believe appears to be based upon an uninformed
>>>>> opinion (unless you've personally tested and evaluated this meter,
and
>>>>> compared features,quality, and price with either a Fluke or a
Tektronix
>>>>> multimeter).
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to formulate an informed opinion, rather than spewing forth
an
>>>>> uninformed opinion as you have, the make of this meter is XILE, and
the
>>>>> Model is XL830L.  It is not a Fluke or a Tektronix meter, nor is
it's 
>>>>> price
>>>>> that of a Fluke or a Tektronix multimeter.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>   " No results found for XILE XL830L"
>>>
>>> I got some hits for XILE on the chinese crap im****tation websites.
>>> Nothing for that meter, unsurprisingly.
>>>
>>
>>    He told me I needed a better search engine. There are no results on
any 
>> search I used other than his posts.
>>

>Not to back up the OP, but a google search returned 331 pages of
results...
>http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS214US214&q=XL830L&btnG=Search

Google guesses at 299 hits, then returns 2 pages.  It was 67 hits,
actually,
2/3rds of them chinese.  (your url includes a 50 hits/page specification)
(page 2 was hits 51-67)

I probably got no hits because the ****ing idiot had misspelled the
manufacturer's name.

XILE != XIOLE

I had searched for "XILE XL830L" and unsurprisingly, got nothing but
the OP's advertisements.

BTW:  when posting a google link, you can leave off all the crap except
for the ?q=<searchstring> part.  For example, all you need is:
http://www.google.com/search?q=xl830l