Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Audio > High End Audio > Re: The Emperor...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 26 Topic 6150 of 6214
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate

by Steven Sullivan <ssully@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 8, 2008 at 10:17 PM

Codifus <codifus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Steven Sullivan wrote:
> > awareness that 'hi rez' is a solution looking for a problem, seems to
> > be growing...
> > 
> > From the online April issue of MIX magazine
> > 
> >
http://mixonline.com/recording/mixing/audio_emperors_new_sampling/index.html
> > 
> > ___
> > -S 
> > maybe they wanna rock.
> > maybe they need to rock.
> > Maybe it's for the money?  But That's none of our business..our
business as fans is to rock 
> > with them.
> I think its funny that Mr. Winer thinks that comb filtering may be 
> responsible for everyone's different impressions when sampling audio. 
> Sitting down in the same spot with a give-or-take of 4 inches, 
> impossible? I think not.

> Those of us who really like audio tend to aslo have a favorite chair or 
> spot in the listening room that we like to sit in. I'm sorry, but I 
> think's it's very easy for us mere mortals to sit in the same spot, 
> definitely at least within in an inch.

Within 4 inches, yes...within an inch, maybe.  But audible differences can
result
from positional differences of less than that.

Solution: to do comparison rigorously, use headphones.

___
-S 
maybe they wanna rock.
maybe they need to rock.
Maybe it's for the money?  But That's none of our business..our business
as fans is to rock 
with them.
 




 26 Posts in Topic:
The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-07 22:20:03 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
MINe109 <smcelroy2@[EM  2008-04-08 01:36:08 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-08 22:17:18 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
MINe109 <smcelroy2@[EM  2008-04-09 22:30:13 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-11 00:42:38 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
MINe109 <smcelroy2@[EM  2008-04-11 21:46:41 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-12 21:44:53 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
MINe109 <smcelroy2@[EM  2008-04-13 13:57:50 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-14 02:13:44 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
MINe109 <smcelroy2@[EM  2008-04-15 01:50:36 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-18 21:42:33 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-20 14:30:58 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-20 14:31:28 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
MINe109 <smcelroy2@[EM  2008-04-19 16:34:04 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-20 14:41:04 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Sonnova <sonnova@[EMAI  2008-04-08 01:37:01 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Codifus <codifus@[EMAI  2008-04-08 01:37:40 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
"Arny Krueger"   2008-04-08 22:16:15 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Steven Sullivan <ssull  2008-04-08 22:17:38 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Allen <none@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-08 22:24:06 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
codifus <codifus@[EMAI  2008-04-09 02:34:18 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Sonnova <sonnova@[EMAI  2008-04-09 22:33:18 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
codifus <codifus@[EMAI  2008-04-09 02:33:59 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Sonnova <sonnova@[EMAI  2008-04-09 22:32:52 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
codifus <codifus@[EMAI  2008-04-11 00:41:29 
Re: The Emperor's New Sample Rate
Mats Peterson <matsp55  2008-04-08 22:23:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 5:02:59 CDT 2008.