jwvm wrote: > The following link might be of interest to some readers here: > > http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/audiophiles-cant-tell-the-difference-between-monster-cable-and/ Yet another idiotic article by another "Patel". Besides, who ever said Monster was high-end or belongs in an audiophiles system? I've always felt their cables were the equivalent to coat hangers all along ;-)
